SHAUKAT MAHAMAD HAJOO AND ORS v. SAU. NOORJAHN RAFIK BANDIWALE MAIDEN NAME NOORJAHN MAHAMAD HAJOO AND ORS
IA/898/2022 · 2025-06-23
Shri M M Sathaye
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42341 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42341 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
8 IA-898-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.898 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.34 OF 2021 Shaukat Mahamad Hajoo & Ors. …Applicants V/s. NoorJahan Rafik Bandiwale Maiden Name Noorjahan Mahamad Hajoo & Ors. …Respondents *** Mr. Rohit P. Mahadik i/b. Khandeparkar & Associates for Applicant. Mr. Abhishek Patil for Respondents. *** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 23rd June, 2025
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This application is filed praying for expeditious hearing and fixing peremptory date of hearing the second appeal.
2. Record shows that on 01.03.2021, when the Appeal was admitted, the hearing of the appeal is already expedited.
3. The Appeal is of the year 2021; therefore considering over all pendency of the second appeals, peremptory date cannot be fixed. However, as already ordered, hearing of the second appeal remains expedited.
4. Interim application is disposed of.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Husen HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Digitally signed by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date: 2025.06.24 10:05:08 +0530