1 2025:CGHC:25467 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1020 of 2018 1 - Goutam Chand Jain (Dead) Through Lrs. As Per Honble Court Order Dated- 08-04-2025. 1.1 - Smt. Sushila Devi Jain W/o Late Goutam Chand Jain Aged About 67 Years R/o. Ward No. 08, Bakshi Marg, Khairagarh, District Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan-Gandai, (C.G.) 1.2 - Nitendra Jain S/o Late Goutam Chand Jain Aged About 51 Years R/o D- 203/1, Aashirvad RMS Colony, Near Digamnbar Jain Mandir, Tagore Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 1.3 - Nilesh Jain S/o Late Goutam Chand Jain Aged About 50 Years R/o. D- 107, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 1.4 - Bothra Shashi Jain D/o Late Goutam Chand Jain W/o Bothra Ajit Kumar, Aged About 49 Years, R/o H. No. 4-9-28, Bingi Street, Near Kalpana Theatre, Vizianagaram, Andhra Pradesh, 535003. ... Petitioners versus 1 - Gagan Singh S/o Late Govind Singh Advocate, R/o Turkari Para, Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Gunjan Singh S/o Late Govind Singh Advocate, R/o Turkari Para, Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Lalita Singh W/o Late Govind Singh Advocate, R/o Turkari Para, Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh............(Judgment Debtors) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Komal Yadav, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For Respondents No. 2 & 3 : Ms. Reema Dubey, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. C.K. Kesharwani, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.06.20 10:36:47 +0530 2 18.06.2025 1. The petitioners have preferred the instant petition against the order passed by Civil Judge Class I, Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon C.G. in Execution Case No. 23A/2014 dated 15.10.2018 whereby the application preferred by the petitioners under Order 21 Rule 32 of the C.P.C. has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners would submit that against the order passed by Lok Adalat, they have preferred an appeal bearing SA No. 640 of 2024 which is pending before this Court. 3. In view of submission made by learned counsel for petitioners, at this juncture it is not justifiable for this Court to proceed further in the matter. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that disposal of this petition will not come in way of other proceedings which are pending before the Court of law. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika