C.Lakshmi Narasimha Reddy, v. Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh
WP/9683/2016 · 2025-10-30
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42335 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42335 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010259782016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 9683 OF 2016 Between:
1. C.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA REDDY,, S/O. C.NARASIMHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.1/648, NANDYAL ROAD, TADPATRI, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
2. T. ANAND MOHAN, S/O. T.RAGHUNATH SASTRY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO.70, NEAR TAGOR HIGH SCHOOL, GURU RAGHAVENDRA NAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
3. Y.SAMBASIVA REDDY,, S/O. Y.NARAYAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO.17/ 1-219-2, VENUGOPAL NAGAR, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH, LTD., VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., KADAPA ZONE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION &MAINTENANCE, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD.,
NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION &MAINTENANCE,
- TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
6. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION &MAINTENANCE, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD., HINDUPUR, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
None appeared for the Writ Petitioners.
2. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the Tender Notification issued on 03.03.2016.
3. Sri Tallapragada Sriram, learned Junior Standing Counsel for Respondent No. 2, on Instructions, submits that this Writ Petition has become Infructuous, inasmuch as the Tender Notification has long expired.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having become Infructuous. No order as to costs.
5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
_________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 31.10.2025 DSV
166
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 9683 OF 2016 31.10.2025
DSV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 9683 OF 2016 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE ORDER Office Note
31.10.2025 GRKP, J
Writ Petition is disposed of as Infructuous. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J DSV