Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42332 (RAJ)

KIRTI KUMARI NAYAK W/O KAUSHAL NAYAK, D/O DASHRATHA LAL NAYAK v. SMT. GAYATRI A. RATHORE

CCP/813/2025 · 2025-09-24

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39371] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 813/2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4043/2025 Kirti Kumari Nayak W/o Kaushal Nayak, D/o Dashratha Lal Nayak, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Bihari Pole, Kumawat Colony, New City, Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Gayatri A. Rathore, Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Sh. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Additional Director(Admin), Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawna, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. Maj. Gen. Alok Raj, Chairman, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Bhag Chand Badhal, Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur Rajasthan. 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amir Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/09/2025 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 25.03.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4043/2025. 2. The Court vide order dated 25.03.2025, directed the respondents/competent authority to consider the representation dated 10.03.2025 sympathetically, within a period of 15 days from [2025:RJ-JP:39371] (2 of 2) [CCP-813/2025] the date of passing of the order, strictly in accordance with law, by way of speaking order. 3. Though the representation dated 10.03.2025 has not been placed on record which was supposed to be decided by the authority but on asking, counsel for the petitioner has submitted before this Court, the photocopy of the representation dated 10.03.2025, same is taken on record. 4. The representation dated 10.03.2025 is addressed to the Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur. 5. After passing of the direction by the Court, the petitioner has submitted the copy of the order for compliance to the Project Director, National Health Mission, Jaipur. 6. The representation was submitted to the Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur whereas, the petitioner has submitted the copy of order for compliance to some other authority. 7. In view of the directions of the Court, the representation was to be considered and decided by the Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur but the petitioner is not able to show that he has ever served copy of the order to the Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board to whom the representation was submitted on 10.03.2025. 8. The present contempt petition filed by the petitioner wholly misconceived and accordingly, the same is dismissed with a cost of Rs.1,000/- to be deposited with the Rajasthan High Court Munshi Sangh, Jaipur. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /51