CWP-9529-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Hader Ali and others Union of India and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate and Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Vibhor Bansal, Mr. Ishank Bansal, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate, for respondent No. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL 1. On oral request made by learned counsel for the Haryana Rail Infrastructure Development Corporation 3rd Floor, Sector 17 is ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.5 in the main petition. registry to make necessary 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the representation dated 23.0 2024 (O&M) Sr. No.278 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9529 Date of Decision : Hader Ali and others Versus Union of India and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate and Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr.Vibhor Bansal, Senior Panel Counsel and Mr. Ishank Bansal, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate, for respondent No. 2 Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) On oral request made by learned counsel for the Infrastructure Development Corporation Floor, Sector 17-A, Chandigarh-160017 through its Managing Director is ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.5 in the main petition. egistry to make necessary changes in the memo of parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a the newly added respondent No. representation dated 23.01.2024 (Annexure P-7) made IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 9529-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.09.2025 …Petitioners …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Senior Panel Counsel and Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. On oral request made by learned counsel for the petitioners, Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, SCO 17-19, through its Managing Director is ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.5 in the main petition. The changes in the memo of parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a respondent No.5 to take a decision on the 7) made by the petitioners. VANDANA 2025.09.18 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-9529-2024 3. Learned notice, have no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 4. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to No.5 to take a decision on the representation dated P-7), made by with law and after affording opportunity of hearing to all preferably within three order. 5. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicat the petitioners they would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. September 15 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable 2024 (O&M) Learned counsel for the respondents no objection if the above prayer made on the petitioners’ behalf Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to to take a decision on the representation dated by the petitioners, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law and after affording opportunity of hearing to all preferably within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicat and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 5, 2025 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No for the respondents, who appears on advance made on the petitioners’ behalf Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent to take a decision on the representation dated 23.01.2024 (Annexure , by passing a speaking order in accordance with law and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, from the date of receipt of a copy of this Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.09.18 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document