Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4233 (UTT)

VASEEM ALI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/871/2025 · 2025-06-02

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 47 WPMS No.871 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the respondent no.2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:- i. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to allow the petitioner for doing the internship after passing out the final year exam of BAMS. ii. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to refund the excess amount deposit by the petitioner as per government order dated 14-10- 15 (annexure no-1) with this petition. iii. Issue a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent, the internship of the petitioner may be taken into account since the period he passed the final year Exam. iv. Issue any other suitable writ or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Heard. As soon as the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated 08.01.2025, passed by this Court in WPMS No.513 of 2020, Bindiya Khatri and Others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others, and connected matters. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 admits this fact. Since the matter is covered, instant petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 08.01.2025, passed by this Court in WPMS No.513 of 2020, Bindiya Khatri and Others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others, and connected matters. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 02.06.2025 RV