1 2025:CGHC:39776-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1920 of 2022 1 - Mohammad Sahim S/o Mohammad Sarfuddin Aged About 16 Years Through - Legal Guardian Father Mohammad Sarfuddin S/o Mohammad Javed, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Ward No. 27, Mova, Sardhoo, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ayazuddin Ansari S/o Jalaluddin Ansari Aged About 26 Years R/o Behind Samudaik Bhawan, Nayapara, Sirgitti, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Naveel Khan S/o Naeem Khan Aged About 25 Years 4 - Bashar Khan S/o Naeem Khan Aged About 23 Years No. 3 and 4 are resident of Ward No. 31, Near Hand Pump, Rewa Road, Post Sohagpur, District : Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh 5 - Aman Hussain S/o Late Sajid Hussain Aged About 22 Years R/o Kumhar Gali, Talapara, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Superintendent Of Police, Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Station House Officer, Police Station Chirmiri, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Kumari Vidisha Mahot D/o Narendra Mahot Aged About 19 Years R/o Godaripara, Chirmiri, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent(s) / respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 08/08/2025 1 Heard Mr. Achyut Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No. 1 and 2. 2 By this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the petitioners have prayed for the following relief(s): “1. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the FIR No. 258/2022 registered at P.S. Chirmiri, District Kroiya (C.G.) in the interest of justice. 2. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash / set aside the FIR bearing Crime No. 258/2022 (Annexure P/1) and further investigation against the petitioners, in the interest of justice. 3. Any other reliefs which this Hon’ble Court deem fits may kindly be granted in favour of petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 3 At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 and 2 submits that after investigation, closure report has been filed in this case and as such, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 3 4 In view of the above submission, this petition stands disposed of. However, if the respondent No. 3 is aggrieved by the aforesaid closure report, she may take recourse to law before the appropriate forum. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Amit AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2025.08.11 11:04:37 +0530