Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4232 (CHH)

Sant Prasad Pandey v. Ku. Ritika Pandey

CRR/83/2018 · 2025-06-30

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:29643 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 83 of 2018 1 - Sant Prasad Pandey Late Shivshankar Pandey, Aged About 55 Years R/o Sector 11 Zone 2 Near Udiya Odiya School Near Canal Balaji Nagar Khursipar Police Station Bhilai Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Ku. Ritika Pandey Shri Sant Prasad Pandey, Aged About 5 Years Minor Represented Through Mother Pushpa Pandey Wife Of Late Parasnath Tripathi, R/o Mig 1/2937, Housing Board Colony, Bhilai, Police Station Jamul Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ku. Muskan Pandey, Shri Sant Prasad Pandey, Aged About 14 Years Minor Represented Through Mother Pushpa Pandey Wife Of Late Parasnath Tripathi, R/o Mig 1/2937, Housing Board Colony, Bhilai, Police Station Jamul Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicant For Applicant : None For Non-applicant : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 01.07 .202 5 . 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicant to press this revision on repeated calls. 2. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:- RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 “It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the revision and set-aside the impugned order dated 29.03.2017, in the interest of justice.” 3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Interim relief if any stands vacated. 5. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan