Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RFA 513/2017 p. 1 $~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM APPL. 74579/2025 IN + RFA 513/2017 SUBHASH GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Snigdha Swagatika Jena, Advocate versus LALIT KUMAR GUPTA .....Respondent Through: CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 19.01.2026 CM APPL. 60702/2025 (seeking appropriate directions to the Registry and/or UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch to release the deposited amount in favour of the appellant)
1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the appellant seeking appropriate directions to the Registry for release of the deposited amount in favour of the appellant, in terms of the order dated 1st August, 2025, passed by this Court. 2. The present appeal was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 1st August, 2025, in terms of the understanding/settlement arrived at between the appellant and the respondent. 3. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court vide order dated 1st August, 2025, the Registry had initiated the process for releasing the deposited amount in favour of the appellant. However, the appellant was informed that This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/01/2026 at 13:44:38
RFA 513/2017 p. 2 objection had been raised by the concerned bank, since the name of the appellant, as mentioned in the present appeal, i.e. ‘Shri Subhash Gupta’, does not match with the name mentioned in the official documents submitted by the appellant, wherein the name ‘Subhash Kumar Gupta’ is reflected. Thus, it is submitted that both the names, ‘Subhash Kumar Gupta’ and ‘Subhash Gupta’, are of one and the same person. 4. Accordingly, matter was placed before the Registrar for ascertaining the fact whether ‘Subhash Gupta’ and ‘Subhash Kumar Gupta’ are one and the same person. 5. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the Registrar vide order dated 15th January, 2026 has confirmed that ‘Subhash Gupta’ and ‘Subhash Kumar Gupta’ are one and the same person. 6. In view thereof, a direction is issued to the Registry to release the amount deposited in favour of the appellant in terms of the order passed by this Court on 1st August, 2025. 7. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. CM APPL.
74579/2025 (seeking change of name of the appellant from ‘Subhash Gupta’ to ‘Subhash Kumar Gupta’)
8. In view of the order passed above, the name of the appellant for the purposes of present appeal is directed to be changed from ‘Subhash Gupta’ to ‘Subhash Kumar Gupta’. 9. The amended memo of parties filed is taken on record. 10. The date of 31st January 2026, before the Registrar stands cancelled. AMIT BANSAL, J JANUARY 19, 2026 ds This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/01/2026 at 13:44:38