Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42299 (ALL)

BHUVENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/4786/2025 · 2025-04-22

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4786 of 2025 Petitioner :- Bhuvendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sant Ram Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Sant Ram Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 and 5 and learned Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner claims that he is entitled appointment on compassionate grounds. He has made a representation in this regard but to no avail. Shri Dinesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 4 and 5 submits that the matter requires determination of facts and the eligibility of the petitioner by the competent authority as per law in the first instance. However, he fairly contends that claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment is liable to be decided by the competent authority in a reasonable time frame. In light of the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, the respondent no. 4 shall decide the representation of the petitioner regarding grant compassionate appointment after hearing the other legal heirs of the deceased as per law preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with a fresh copy of the representation. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 23.4.2025 Vandit Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad