Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42298 (BOM)

SAMPADA SAKHARAM BAWALEKAR @ SAMPADA ROSHAN SINGNATH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/11099/2025 · 2025-09-24

Sharmila U Deshmukh, Shri M S Karnik

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

907-11099-2025-CWP=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11099 OF 2025 Sampada Sakharam Bawalekar @ Sampada Roshan Singnath … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Datta Pawar for the petitioners. Ms.T.J. Kapre, AGP for the respondent - State. …………. Coram : M. S. Karnik & Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ. Date : September 24, 2025. P. C. : 1. We have heard learned AGP. He submits that vigilance cell inquiry is completed and the petition can be allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) by granting a reasonable time. 2. Accordingly, the respondent no.2 – Scrutiny Committee is directed to decide the application within a period of 6 weeks from today. 3. The petition is disposed of. [ Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. ] [ M. S. Karnik ] Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 1 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2025.09.25 10:05:49 +0530