APHC010413342023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. BETWEEN: 1. NAKKALA RAMUDU, S/o. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 2. VADLAMUDI JHANSI, W/o. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 3. METTU VENKATA RAO, S/o. RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 4. NAKKALA NAGALAKSHMI, W/o. RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YERS, (ALL ARE R/o ADAVEEDHIPALEM, H/O MOTUPALLY VILLAGE, CHINNGANJAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT) 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA REVENUE DIVISION, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, CHINNAGANJAM MANDAL, CHINN BAPATLA DISTRICT. 6. P DANIYELU, S/o. DEVAIAH, S/o. DEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/o. AMBEDKAR NAGAR, CHINNAGANJAM, CHINNAGANJAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 21861/2023 NAKKALA RAMUDU, S/o. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 50 VADLAMUDI JHANSI, W/o. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 35 METTU VENKATA RAO, S/o. RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NAKKALA NAGALAKSHMI, W/o. RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 45 (ALL ARE R/o ADAVEEDHIPALEM, H/O MOTUPALLY VILLAGE, CHINNGANJAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT) ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI CAPITAL CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA REVENUE DIVISION, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. THE TAHSILDAR, CHINNAGANJAM MANDAL, CHINN BAPATLA DISTRICT. P DANIYELU, S/o. DEVAIAH, S/o. DEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/o. AMBEDKAR NAGAR, CHINNAGANJAM, CHINNAGANJAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3330] THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO NAKKALA RAMUDU, S/o. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 50 VADLAMUDI JHANSI, W/o. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 35 METTU VENKATA RAO, S/o. RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NAKKALA NAGALAKSHMI, W/o. RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 45 (ALL ARE R/o ADAVEEDHIPALEM, H/O MOTUPALLY VILLAGE, CHINNGANJAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT) ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, BAPATLA DISTRICT, BAPATLA. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHIRALA REVENUE THE TAHSILDAR, CHINNAGANJAM MANDAL, CHINNAGANJAM, P DANIYELU, S/o. DEVAIAH, S/o. DEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/o. AMBEDKAR NAGAR, CHINNAGANJAM, 2 7. BETHALA ULDARANI, W/o. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/o AMBEDKAR NAGAR, CHINNAGANAJAM, CHINNAGANJAM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order in D.Dis.D1/2297/2023 dated 10-08-2023 of the 3rd Respondent, cancelling the Pattadar Pass Books granted to the petitioners with regard the land measuring to an extent of AC.6-46 Cts in Sy.No.128 of Motupalli Village, Chinnaganjam Mandal, Bapatla District as arbitrary, illegal, extraneous considerations, in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, and also in violation of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the land in Sy.No.128 to an extent of Ac.6-46 Cts in Motupalli Village, Chinnaganjam Mandal, Bapatla Mandal, by setting aside the orders in D.Dis.D1/2297/2023 dated 10-08-2023 of the 3rd Respondent, and to pass appropriate such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. YUVARAJ NANNAM The Court made the following: