[2025:RJ-JP:42881] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13016/2025 Amrita Bharadwaj Daughter Of Sh. Rajendra Kumar Malviya, Adopted Daughter Of Smt. Sarojlata Malviya, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 47, Shiv Shakti Colony, Shiv Nagar, Fai Sagar Road, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Having Its Registered Office At Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer- 305004 Through Its Secretary (Administration). ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kartar Singh For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 10/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: It is therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition; and further be pleased declare the communication dated 11.07.2025 (Annx-2) as illegal, and further be pleased to direct the respondent AVVNL to grant compassionate appointment to the petitioner in place of her deceased adoptive mother on any suitable post according to the qualifications of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment dated 02.01.2024 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.1119/2022 titled as Smt. Durga Vs. State of [2025:RJ-JP:42881] (2 of 2) [CW-13016/2025] Rajasthan and Ors. and submits that the controversy raised herein is no more res-integra and same is settled from the judgment passed by Hon’ble Division Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 3. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and on perusal of material placed on record, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to petitioner to file a representation to the respondent, who is at liberty to decide in accordance with ratio laid down by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Durga Vs. State of Rajasthan (Supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondent- Authority within a period of four weeks raising all grounds and the respondent-Authority is directed to decide the representation in light of judgement as referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondent is under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /22