[2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (1 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 960/2025 1. Vijay Kumar Choudhary S/o Virendra Singh Choudhary, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bhata Ki Dhani, Village Sudar- shanpura, Post Jalsoo, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Dharmendra Mali S/o Shyam Lal Mali, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Maliyo Ki Chouki, Amargarh, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. ----Appellants Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Mukesh S/o Prema Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 3/234, Old Housing Board, Pali, District Pali, Rajasthan. 3. Babita Varma D/o Sharawan Kumar Varma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Chhawani Badi, Jamat, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 4. Asha Dangi D/o Nand Lal Dangi, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Thoor, Tehsil Badgaon, District Udaipur, Ra- jasthan. 5. Jimmy Gupta S/o Lokesh Gupta, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Near Bus Stand, Bhartari Colony, Bayana, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 6. Kailash Kunwar Rathore D/o Bheru Singh Rathore, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Kochala, Post Sultan Ji Ka Kherwara, Tehsil Jhadol, District Udaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Suraj Saini S/o Rampal Saini, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Plot No. 98, Kakuniya Ki Dhani, Boytawala, Benar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 8. Hanuman Nogiya S/o Bhola Shankar Verma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Deipol Chungi Naka, Ward No. 12, Nainwa, Bundi, Rajasthan. 9. Abhishek Chouhan S/o Ganga Sagar Chouhan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Chouhan Panchayat Bhawan Ke Pass, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 10. Manoj Sharma S/o Mangal Chand Sharma, Aged About 22 [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (2 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] Years, R/o Village Radhapura, Post Radhapura, Post Rad- hakishanpura, Block Jalsoo, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 926/2025 Kaustubh Sharma S/o Late Pramod Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bani Park Colony Mirzapur Road District-Sawaimad- hopur Rajasthan 322201. ----Appellant Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Depart- ment Of Information Technology And Communication, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Dur- gapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 982/2025 Pukhraj Gurjar S/o Ramji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vill. Soonthra Post Soonthra Teh.-Uniyara, District -Tonk. ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technologies And Communications, Secretari- ate, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur - 302018, Rajasthan. 3. Kundan Swami S/o Sita Ram Swami, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Shiv Colony Med Viratnagar, District Jaipur. 4. Shailendra Kumar S/o Suraj Mal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill-Murraki Post Didyari Teh-Bayana, District Bharat- pur. 5. Monu Jangid D/o Sharwan Kumar Jangir, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Jyoti Nagar, Dhod Road, Sikar. 6. Balvenendra Kumar S/o Sohanlal, Aged About 30 Years, [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (3 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] R/o Vpo -Channa Teh-Chirawa District-Jhunjhunu. 7. Prerana Sharma D/o Ramavatar Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo-Alisar Via-Kaladera Teh. -Chomu, District Jaipur. 8. Yogesh Kumar Saini S/o Madan Lal Saini, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill-Manota Khurd, Post -Khetri Nagar, Teh- Khetri, District Jhunjhunu. 9. Abhay Singh S/o Tej Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gali District Bharatpur, Rajasthan -321642. 10. Pankaj D/o Hetram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Suresh Ku- mar Raslana, Hanumangarh 335502, Presently Residing At 55/47 Heera Path, Madhyam Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur. 11. Pankaj Kumar Bairwa S/o Babulal Bairwa, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill-Naryanpura Post-Peechupara Kalan, Baswa District Dausa, Rajasthan. 12. Jitendra Kumar Meena S/o Rameshwar Prasad Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Dholeta Teh- Nadoti, Dis- trict Karauli-322213. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 983/2025 Vishnu Sharma S/o Mahesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o A-51, Balaji Vihar-16, Badh Shyopur, Ashawala, Vatika Road, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Idris Khan S/o Bashir Khan, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Mohammedpura, Nagaur, Rajasthan. 3. Seema Choudhary D/o Ram Chandra Choudhary, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Plot No. 53, Brij Mandal Colony, 100 Feet Road, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Shivang Sharma S/o Jainath Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 629, Mahaveer Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. 5. Pankaj Kumar Bairwa S/o Babu Lal Bairwa, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Narayanpura, Post Peechupara Kalan, [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (4 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] Dausa, Rajasthan. 6. Pawan Kumar Bairwa S/o Bhoma Ram Bairwa, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Plot No. A-19, Gayatri Nagar, Agra Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. 7. Anand Singh Gurjar S/o Amar Singh Gurjar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Opposite Bharat Petrol Pump, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur Road, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 8. Ravishankar Ankodiya S/o Murari Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Amargarh, Tehsil Sapotara, District Ka- rauli, Rajasthan. 9. Vishvendra Singh S/o Ratipal Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Shakti Vihar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 10. Priyanka Jain D/o Lalit Jain, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Plot No. 1, Hanuman City B, R.k. Puram, Sitapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 984/2025 Neeraj Kumar Gupta S/o Madan Mohan Gupta, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Bandariya Ke Balaji, Gangapur City, Swaimad- hopur, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Sajan Singh Panwar S/o Dinesh Singh Panwar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Mukta Prasad Colony, District- Bikaner, Rajasthan. 3. Sandeep Tak S/o Hazari Mal Tak, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Chambika Thanda, District- Jodhpur, Rajasthan. 4. Sagar Mal Poonia S/o Kalyan Mal Poonia, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vpo Harsoli, Via-K Renwal, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 985/2025 1. Vishal Ramawat S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Shri Ram Kutir, Khara Kua School, Rajendra Colony, Jalore, Ra- jasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (5 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 2. Ashish Sahu S/o Raj Bihari Sahu, aged about 28 years, R/o 47 Prem Nagar Extension, Riddhi Siddhi Chouraha, Gopalupra Byepass, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Appellants Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board through its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent 2. Bhawana Kumawat D/o Premprakash Kumawat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dwarka Nagar, Lane No. 1, Chorasiya Was Road, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. Pramod Kumawat S/o Ram Swaroop Kumawat, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Jai Balaji Furnitures, Opposite Barala Marriage Garden, Ward No. 15, Indra Colony, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. 4. Subhangi Patodiya D/o Ram Ratan Patodiya, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Shri Balaji Garments, New Market City, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 5. 6. Karamveer Singh S/o Badri Lal Gehlot, Aged about 26 years, R/o Bhawani Chowk, Barli Sadri, Tehsil Desuri, Dis- trict Pali, Rajasthan Laxmi Bohra D/o Umed Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Sri Vijay Nagar, District Sriganganagar, Ra- jasthan. 7. Jyotsna Tolambiya D/o Mangi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 11/34, Tolambiya Sadan, Kumbha Road, Sector A, Azad Nagar, Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 8. Priya Kumawat D/o Jairam Kumawat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kumawato Ka Mohalla, Manoharpur, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 986/2025 Mangi Lal S/o Gopi Kishan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Newari, Tehsil Pachpadra, Kalyanpura, District Barmer, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (6 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Mamta Meena D/o Haari Narayan Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Plot No. 36, Parshvnath Nagar, Near Airport Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Namichand Mourya S/o Ganpat Lal Mourya, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 356, Kishan Marg, Naya Khera, Ambabadi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Yogesh Upadhyay S/o Santosh Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o F-141, Mdv Colony, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 5. Adish Gautam S/o Chandrashekhar Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Sunaro Ka Mohalla, Chechat, District Kota, Rajasthan. 6. Hemant Katrawat S/o Lakhan Lal Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 33 Prem Nagar, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. 7. Udai Singh Sisodiya S/o Gordhan Singh Sisodiya, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Krishi Mandi Ke Samne, Kalyanpura, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 8. Dilip Kumar Koli S/o Amba Lal Koli, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Adarsh Nagar, Gali No. 8, Kota Road, Bhilwara, Dausa, Rajasthan 9. Rakesh Sharma S/o Ramesh Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 383, Keshav Nagar, Somnath Nagar, Agra Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. 10. Indraj Meena S/o Narayan Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bhat Ka Bas, Post Raisar, Tehsil Andhi District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 11. Swetha D/o Khuma Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Salwa Kalan, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. 12. Vinita Arora D/o Ram Ratan Arora, Aged About 33 Years, R/o A-7, Marwar Nagar, Behind Railway Station, Ma- hamandir, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 987/2025 Priyanka Pancholi D/o Gordhan Pancholi, Aged About 33 Years, R/o H. No. 45, Gate No. 3, Rajat Grah Colony, Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Appellant [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (7 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Sanjeev Kumar Kapareta S/o Rishi Kesh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Near Railway Station, Krishna Colony, Bari, Tehsil Bari, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 3. Jeetendra Kumar Sharma S/o Santram Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Jaganer Road, Timasiya, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 4. Yogesh Kumar Sharma S/o Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Near Rajmahal Marriage Home, Patel Nagar Road, Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 5. Ashok Kumar Meena S/o Radheshyam Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Shreema, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 6. Nikhilesh Sharma S/o Madan Mohan Sharma, R/o 151, Maliyon Ki Dhani, Sumel, Keshav Vidhya Peeth, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Mohan Lal Meghwal S/o Tara Ram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 446, Naya Meghwal Vas, Jamotara, Post Bhutgaon, District Sirohi, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 988/2025 1. Manish Kumar Rachhouya S/o Prabhu Dayal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 31-B, Ambedkar Nagar, Kartarpura Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Devashish Dasaya S/o Heera Lal Dasaya, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Suraj Pol Gate Ke Pass, Manohar Thana, Dis- trict Jhalawar, Rajasthan. 3. Ajay Kumar S/o Kanhaiya Lal Bagdi, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Behind Bagdi Bhawan, Nehru Nagar, Shri Nagar Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 4. Asish Patanwal S/o Lallu Lal Mahawar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Opposite State Ware House, Choudhary Colony, Agra Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. 5. Ravikant Sharma S/o Bhairu Ram Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Pataliyo Ki Dhani, Jaipur Road, Thanagazi Al- [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (8 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 6. war, Rajasthan. Arpit Singhal S/o Rameshwar Prasad Gupta, aged about 27 years, R/o Agrasen Colony, Gangapurcity, Sawaimad- hopur, Rajasthan. ----Appellants Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Manish Kumar Acharya S/o Nand Lal Acharya, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Dayal Nagar, Dudu Road, Phagi, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. 3. Vivek Gurjar S/o Meetha Lal Gurjar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Jairampura, Post Hingotiya, Tehsil Lawan, Dis- trict Dausa, Rajasthan. 4. Kamlesh Kumar Yadav S/o Ramkaran Yadav, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Dhani Maidaswali, Village Udawala, Post Ghashipura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Vinod Verma S/o Rajesh Verma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Nh 52, Village Shishu, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 6. Rajendra Meena S/o Prithvi Raj Meena, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo Shaharakar, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 7. Urmila Kumari Jangir D/o Rajendra Prashad, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Sanwaloda Dhaylan, Sikar, Rajasthan. 8. Priyanka Chaudhary D/o Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Flat No. 52, Plot No. 84, Arpit Nagar, B Block, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 9. Divyank Dhumas S/o Surat Ram Dhumas, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Chhipo Ka Mohalla, Phooliya Kalan, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 10. Sulochana Dhumas D/o Surat Ram Dhumas, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Chhipo Ka Mohalla, Phooliya Kalan, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 11. Saral Saini D/o Jagdish Mali, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Nainshukh Ki Baghiya, Jinshi, Ward No. 4 Tonk, Ra- jasthan. 12. Anil Acharya S/o Shankar Lal Acharya, Aged About 26 [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (9 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] Years, R/o Shiv Colony, 100 Feet Road, Raj Nagar,district Rajsamand, Rajasthan. 13. Saroj Kumari D/o Het Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vil- lage Dinarpura, Post Katrathal, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 14. Anil Kumar Nagar S/o Janki Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Dhakad Mohalla, Sirpoi, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. 15. Anita Dasaya D/o Ramesh Chand, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Suraj Pol Gate, Manohar Thana, District Jhalawar, Ra- jasthan. 16. Ajay Kumar Soyal S/o Shiv Ji Ram Soyal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Rajmahal, Tehsil Deoli, District Tonk, Ra- jasthan. 17. Deepak Kumar S/o Rakesh Kumar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Patidar Mohalla, Vpo Dhabla Khinchi, Tehsil Sunel, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. 18. Rakesh Kumar Rana S/o Rameshwar Prasad Rana, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Pratappura, Post Jorpura, Tehsil Job- ner, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 19. Bhartendu Lawaniya S/o Suresh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward House Road, Katara Goyal Computer Ke Samne, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 20. Mohit Didel S/o Dharm Singh Choudhary, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Didel Ki Dhani, Itawa, Phulera, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. 21. Rajeev Chimpa S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vpo Khyaliwala, 11 Lnp, District Sriganganagar, Ra- jasthan. 22. Amit Rawat S/o Anoop Kumar, R/o Gali No.10,vishnupuri Colony, Near Hathras City Railway Station, District Hathras, Uttar Pradesh. 23. Shubham Chouhan S/o Ashok Chouhan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near National Fitness Centre, Siyaram Nagar, Chandravardai Nagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan 24. Lokendra Singh Chauhan S/o Babu Singh Chauhan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Prempura, Post Khan Bhankhari, Tehsil And District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (10 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 989/2025 1. Radhy Shyam Kumawat S/o Dhana Ram Kumawat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 68/150 Near Radhe Bakers Sec. 6 Haldi Ghati Gate Pratap Nagar Tonk Road Jaipur Raj. 302033 2. Himmat Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o A-68 Arawali Nagar Benad Road Nangal Siras Jaipur Raj. 302012 3. Bhanu Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o In Front Of Water Works Barlabas Rajgarh, Al- war Raj. 301408 4. Kailash Kumawat S/o Kanha Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vill Mannapura Kheri Ram Post Akoda Teh. Phulera Jaipur Raj. 303338 5. Satish Verma S/o Modu Lal Verma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Nagar Parishad Ki Gali Regar Mohalla Baharali Bundi Raj. 323001 6. Pushpendra Singh S/o Kamal Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Pushp Vatika Colony Beside Rural Power House Bharatpur Raj. 321001 7. 8. Neha Sharma D/o Shyam Sundar Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 6 Neta Gali, Nansa Gate S.n. Mahila College Ke Pass Dis. Jhunjhunu Raj. 333042 Mohan Lal Meghwal S/o Tara Ram, Aged about 37 years, R/o 446, Naya Meghwal Vas, Jamotra, P.O. Bhutgaon, Dis- trict Sirohi, Rajasthan-307801. ----Appellants Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technologies And Communication Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur 302018 Rajasthan 3. Kirodi Lal Meena S/o Lallu Lal Meena, R/o Vill-Chandawas Post- Hemlyawala Teh. Ram Grah Pachwara Dis. Dausa Raj. 303302 [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (11 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 4. Prashant Nawal S/o Bhagchand Nawal, R/o Vill. Bhudol Vaya Gagwana Ajmer Raj. Dis- Ajmer Per.r/o Shri Vinayak Pollution Checking Center Ajmer Raj. 5. Pankaj Kumar S/o Sitaram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo Budaniya Chirawa Dis. Jhunjhunu Raj 333025 6. Ravi Yadav S/o Jagdish Prasad Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Dusado Ki Dhani Kaladera Dis. Jaipur Raj. 303801 7. Vatsal Joshi S/o Ram Prakash Joshi, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 3806 Gokul Bhawan Deenanath Ji Ka Rasta Jaipur Raj. 302001 8. Somendra S/o Hawa Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vill. Dhani Hukma Post Makro Jhunjhuni Raj. 333504 9. Pooja Meena D/o Jodhraj Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 31 Adarsh Nagar Krishna Colony Tonk Raj. 304001 10. Pushpendra Singh S/o Devi Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Newara Teh. Bhusawar Bharatpur Raj. 321407 11. Pradeep Kumar Meena S/o Amar Singh Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 32A Laxmi Nagar Bhiend Patasa Fac- tory Goner Road Jaipur Raj. 302031 12. Sachin Yadav S/o Vikram Singh Yadav, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill. Kheri Charnan Sikar Raj. 332722 13. Mohit Saini S/o Jugal Kishor Taksaliya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Taksaliya Mohalla, Mujere Wali Gali Main Mar- ket, Deeg Bharatpur Raj. 321203 14. Narendra Khokhar S/o Lala Ram Khokhar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vill. Ganeshpura Post Kalakh Teh. Phulera Jaipur Raj. 303328 15. Surendra Singh S/o Kishan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Gram Sirsya Post Lasadiya Teh. Phagi Jaipur Raj. 303005 16. Shubham Vyas S/o Ajay Vyas, Aged About 27 Years, R/o B-42 Vallabh Nagar Sophia School Road Kota Raj. 324007 17. Deepak Kumar Meena S/o Sanwar Mal Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill. Bai Ka Bas Post. Kanarpura Teh. Chomu Dis. Jaipur Raj. 303801 18. Hemant Kumar Sain S/o Subhash Chand Sain, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vill. Ratangarh Post. Pala Teh. [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (12 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] Malakhera Alwar Raj. 301406 19. Mayur Gupta S/o Ashok Gupta, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Punjabi Mevbasti Dantla Alwar Raj. 301404 20. Himmat Singh Chouhan S/o Babu Singh Chouhan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vill Chatarpura Post Per.r/o 21. Deepak Kumar Sharma S/o Shyam Lal Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Rajaheda Teh. Nadoti Karauli 322213 22. Rishikesh Meena S/o Pyarelal Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill. Post Dhanoli Sawaimadhopur Raj. 322027 23. Shubham Verma S/o Ganesh Lal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ramdevji K Mandir K Pichee, Nagar Parishad Ki Bundi Dis. Bundi Raj. 323001 24. Suman Kanwar D/o Rajendra Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Chhinchhas Teh. Laxmangarh Sikar Raj. 332311 25. Anurag Mittal S/o Om Prakash Mittal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Mittal Bhawan Behind Of Akashwani Gottam Colony Bazariya Sawai Madhopur Rai 322001 26. Bajrang Lal Meena S/o Ramray Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vill Lodera Post Sunara Teh-Newai District-Tonk State-Rajasthan Pincode-304022 27. Ajay Kumar Mahamana S/o Brijendra Singh Mahamana, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Near Ranjeet Nagar A Block Daya Nagar Colony 60 Feet Road Alwar, Raj. 301001 28. Aakanksha Vyas D/o Ajay. Vyas, Aged About 31 Years, R/o B-42 Vallabh Nagar Sophia School Road Kota Raj. 324007 29. Harshit Sharma S/o Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o P.n. 11 Narayan Vihar 2Nd Behind Pinjara- pole Gaushala Tonk Road Sanganer Jaipur Raj. 302029 30. Deepak Sharma S/o Banesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill And Post Gidania Teh. Chirawa Jhun- jhunu Raj. 333027 31. Danish Raza S/o Nisar Ahmed Ansari, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Behind Masjid Sheopur Road Village Khatoli Dist Kota Raj. 325009 32. Hemraj Gurjar S/o Dharmsingh Gurjar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill. Post Bawanpara Dausa Raj. 303326 [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (13 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 33. Harish S/o Manoj Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 174 Jaato Ka Mohalla Bharounda Khurd Jhunjhunu Raj. 333024 34. Mohan Lal Sharma S/o Nanag Ram Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Chirara, Post Khorashyamdass Teh. Amer Voi-Jaitpura Jaipur Raj. 303704 35. Ajay Singh Chauhan S/o Narendra Singh Chauhan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 1 Ga 4 Kala Kuan Housing Board Al- war Raj. 301001 36. Basant Kumar Sen S/o Sarwan Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 31 Sunny Nagar Kumbha Marg Pratap Nagar Sanganer Thana Jaipur 302033 37. Manish Gurjar S/o Jagdish Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bhadang Dhani Bawanpara Bawanpara Dausa Raj. 303326 38. Rahul Saini S/o Sanwar Mal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No 01 Mandawa Jhunjhunu Raj. 333704 39. Hemraj Gurjar S/o Kailash Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill-Kanwarpura Post-Baniyana Teh-Lawan Dausa Raj. 303303 40. Akash Agarwal S/o Sunil Kumar Gupta, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 03 Karni Colony Amarsar Road Sikar Raj. 332701 41. Satpal Singh Gurjar S/o Shyoji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No 09 Village Post Banetha Teh. Uniyara Tonk Raj. 304024 42. Rajesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Balram Gurjar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vill-Akbarpur Post-Shrimahaveerji Mahaveerji Dis-Karauli Raj. 322220 Teh.-Shree 43. Hemant Kumar Gupta S/o Brijesh Gupta, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kalyan Colony Near Bank Of Baroda Bayana Bharatpur Raj. 321401 44. Sandeep Kumar S/o Bhanwar Lal Awana, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo-Jakhora The-Chirawa Via-Mandrella, Jhun- jhunu, Raj. 333025 45. Anita Kumari D/o Khyali Ram Gurjar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo-Jakhora Teh-Chirawa Jhunjhunu Raj. 333025 [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (14 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 46. Darshna Saraswat D/o Poonam Chand Saraswat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 17 Gayatri Nagar Ajmer Road Sodala Jaipur Raj. 302006 47. Vipin Kumar Gurjar S/o Kanhaiya Lal Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vill-Kalighati Post-Bilonchi Via-Morija Teh- Amer Jaipur Raj. 303805 48. Kunal Yadav S/o Suresh Kumar Yadav, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Path No. 1, Krishna Vihar Colony Renwal Road Near Power House Chomu Dis. Jaipur Raj. 303702 49. Akshay Kumar Khatri S/o Hira Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o B-203 Gomti Apartment Sec 18 Pratap Nagar San- ganer Jaipur 302033 50. Himmat Kumar Meena S/o Banshi Dhar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Bhagwanpura Post-Cheeplata Teh- Neem Ka Thana Sikar Raj. 332705 51. Vaidehi Sharma D/o Shrawan Kumar Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vimalpura, Post- Kanarpura, Via Kalader Teh-Chomu Jaipur 303801 52. Mahesh Kumar Sharma S/o Roodmal Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vimalpura Post-Kanapura Teh-Chomu Jaipur 303801 53. Vinod Gochar S/o Shyoji Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vill-Anantganj Post- Dhowara Teh- Hindoli Bundi Raj. 323024 54. Suresh Kumar S/o Girdhari Lal Samota, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Derawali Dhani Post Jairampura Teh- Srimadhopur Sikar Raj. 332715 55. Manish Sharma S/o Banwari Lal Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo-Jatwara Dhani Girdharwas Teh- Bassi Jaipur Raj. 303305 56. Vipin Goutam S/o Prakash Chand Goutam, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 1-G-12 Mahaveer Nagar Extension, Kota 324009 57. Gurjar Ashok S/o Kailash Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dhabhaiyo Ka Mohalla, Harsolao Near Co-Operative Kota, Hrsolao Medta City District Nagaur, Presently Residing At 23, Bajiya Pg, Gangaram Nagar, Gopal Pura Bypass Jaipur 58. Manmohan Singh Gurjar S/o Indraraj Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Peepalkheda, Mahwa Dausa [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (15 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 59. Rajesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Bachhu Singh Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Basda, Geejgarh Road, Sikandra, District Dausa 60. Ajay Varma S/o Lachhi Ram Verma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o House Number 280, Ambedkar Colony, Kunhadi Police Station, Kota 61. Ravinder Singh S/o Ajit Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vill Kherki, Behror, Post- Gunti, District Alwar 62. Ramavtar Meena S/o Bheema Ram Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Rang Lal Ka Pura Tah- Todabhim, District Ka- rauli ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 990/2025 1. Pradeep Kumar Meena S/o Amar Singh Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 32-A, Laxmi Nagar, Behind Patasa Factory, Goner Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Mohit Saini S/o Jugal Kishore Taksaliya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Taksaliya Mohalla, Mujere Wali Gali Main Mar- ket, Deeg, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 3. Hemant Kumar Sain S/o Subhash Chand Sain, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Ratangarh, Post Pala, Teh Malakheda, Alwar, Rajasthan-301406. 4. Rishikesh Meena S/o Pyarelal Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill. Post Dhanoli, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 5. Harshit Sharma S/o Rajendra Prasad Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o P.n. 11, Narayan Vihar-2Nd, Behind Pinjara Pole Gaushala, Tonk Phatak, Sanganer, Jaipur, Raj. 6. Vipin Kumar Gurjar S/o Kanhaiya Lal Gurjar, R/o Vill. Kali Ghati, Post Bilonchi, Via Morija, Tehsil Amber, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. ----Appellants Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technologies And Communications, Secretari- ate, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur- [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (16 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 302018, Rajasthan. 3. Radhy Shyam Kumawat S/o Dhana Ram Kumawat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 68/150, Near Radhe Bakers, Sec.6, Haldi Ghati Gate, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Raj. 4. Kirodi Lal Meena S/o Lallu Lal Meena, R/o Vill-Chandwas, Post- Hemlyawala, Teh. Ram Grah Pachwara, Dis. Dausa, Raj. 5. Prashant Nawal S/o Bhagchand Nawal, R/o Vill. Bhudol Vaya Gagwana Ajmer Raj. Dist- Ajmer Per. R/o Shri Vinayak Pollution Checking Center, Ajmer, Raj. 6. Pankaj Kumar S/o Sitaram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo Budaniya Chirawa, Dis. Jhunjhunu, Raj. 7. Ravi Yadav S/o Jagdish Prasad Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Dusado Ki Dhani, Kaladera, Dis. Jaipur, Raj. 8. Vatsal Joshi S/o Ram Prakash Joshi, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 3806 Gokul Bhawan, Deenanath Ji Ka Rasta, Jaipur, Raj. 9. Somendra S/o Hawa Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vill. Dhani Hukma, Post Makro, Jhunjhunu, Raj. 10. Pooja Meena D/o Jaodhaj Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 31 Adarsh Nagar, Krishna Colony, Tonk, Raj. 11. Pushpendra Singh S/o Devi Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Newara, Teh. Bhusawar, Bharatpur, Raj. 12. Sachin Yadav S/o Vikram Singh Yadav, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill. Kheri Charnan, Sikar, Raj. 13. Himmat Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o A-68, Arawali Nagar, Benad Road, Nangal Siras, Jaipur, Raj. 14. Narendra Khokhar S/o Lala Ram Khokhar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vill. Ganeshpura, Post Kalakh, Teh. Phulera, Jaipur, Raj. 15. Surendra Singh S/o Kishan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Gram Sirsya, Post Lasadiya, Teh. Phagi, Jaipur, Raj. 16. Bhanu Sharma S/o Anil Kumar Sharma, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Infront Of Water Works Barlabas Rajgarh, Al- war, Raj. 17. Shubham Vyas S/o Ajay Vyas, Aged About 27 Years, R/o B-42, Vallabh Nagar, Sophia School Road, Kota Raj. [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (17 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 18. Deepak Kumar Meena S/o Sanwar Mal Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill. Bai Ka Bas, Post. Kanarpura, Teh. Chomu, Dis. Jaipur, Raj. 19. Mayur Gupta S/o Ashok Gupta, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Punjabi Mevbasti Dantla, Alwar, Raj. 20. Himmat Singh Chouhan S/o Babu Singh Chouhan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vill Catarpura, Post Per. R/o. 21. Deepak Kumar Sharma S/o Shyam Lal Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Rajaheda, Teh. Nadoti, Ka- rauli. 22. Shubham Verma S/o Ganesh Lal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ramdevji K Mandir K Pichee, Nagar Parishad Ki Bundi, Dis. Bundi, Raj. 23. Neha Sharma D/o Shyam Sundar Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 6, Neta Gali, Nansa Gate S.n. Mahila College Ke Pass, Dis. Jhunjhunu, Raj. 24. Suman Kanwar D/o Rajendra Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Chhinchhas, Teh. Laxmangarh, Sikar, Raj. 25. Satish Verma S/o Modu Lal Verma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Nagar Parishad Ki Gali, Regar Mohalla, Baharali, Bundi, Raj. 26. Anurag Mittal S/o Om Prakash Mittal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Mittal Bhawan, Behind Of Akashwani Gottam Colony Bazariya, Sawai Madhopur, Raj. 322001. 27. Bajrang Lal Meena S/o Ramrey Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vill. Lodera, Post-Sunara, Teh.- Newai, Distrct- Tonk, State- Rajasthan. Pincode. 28. Pushpendra Singh S/o Kamal Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Pushp Vatika Colony, Beside Rural Power House, Bharatpur, Raj. 29. Ajay Kumar Mahamana S/o Brijendra Singh Mahamana, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Near Ranjeet Nagar, A Block, Daya Nagar Colony, 60 Feet Road, Alwar, Raj. 30. Aakanksha Vyas D/o Ajay Vyas, Aged About 31 Years, R/o B-42, Vallabh Nagar, Sophia School Road, Kota, Raj. 31. Deepak Sharma S/o Banesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill And Post Gidania, Teh. Chirawa, Jhun- jhunu, Raj. [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (18 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 32. Danish Raza S/o Nisar Ahmed Ansari, Aged About 30 Years, Behind Masjid, Sheopur Road, Village Khatoli, Dist. Kota, Raj. 33. Hemraj Gurjar S/o Dharmsingh Gurjar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vill Post Bawanpara, Dausa, Raj. 34. Harish S/o Manoj Kumar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 174, Jaato Ka Mohalla, Bharunda Khurd, Jhunjhunu, Raj. 35. Mohan Lal Sharma S/o Nanag Ram Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Chirara, Post Khorashyamdass, Teh. Amer, Voi. Jaitpura, Jaipur, Raj. 36. Ajay Singh Chauhan S/o Narendra Singh Chauhan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o 1 Ga 4 Kala Kuan, Housing Board, Al- war, Raj. 37. Basant Kumar Sen S/o Sarwan Kumar Sen, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 31, Sunny Nagar, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Na- gar, Sanganer Thana, Jaipur. 38. Manish Gurjar S/o Jagdish Prasad Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bhadang, Dhani Bawanpara Bawanpara, Dausa, Raj. 303326. 39. Kailash Kumawat S/o Kanha Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vill Mannapura Kheri Ram, Post Akoda, Teh. Phulera, Jaipur, Raj. 40. Rahul Saini S/o Sanwar Mal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 01, Mandawa, Jhunjhunu, Raj. 41. Hemraj Gurjar S/o Kailash Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, Vill- Kanwarpura, Post Baniyana, Teh- Lawan, Dausa, Raj. 42. Akash Agarwal S/o Sunil Kumar Gupta, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 03, Karni Colony, Amarsar Road, Sikar, Raj. 43. Satpal Singh Gurjar S/o Shyoji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 09, Village Post Banetha, Teh. Uni- yara, Tonk, Raj. 44. Rajesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Balram Gurjar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vill Akbarpura, Post Shrimahaveerji, Teh. Shree Mahaveerji, Dis. Karauli, Raj. 45. Hemant Kumar Gupta S/o Brijesh Gupta, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kalyan Colony, Near Bank Of Baroda Bayana, Bharatpur, Raj. [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (19 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 46. Sandeep Kumar S/o Bhanwar Lal Awana, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo Jakhora, Teh. Chirawa, Via- Mandrella, Jhunjhunu, Raj. 47. Anita Kumari D/o Khyali Ram Gurjar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vpo- Jakhora, Teh- Chirawa, Jhunjhunu, Raj. 48. Darshna Saraswat D/o Poonam Chand Saraswat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 17, Gayatri Nagar, Ajmer Road, So- dala, Jaipur, Raj. 302006. 49. Kunal Yadav S/o Suresh Kumar Yadav, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Path No.1, Krishna Vihar Colony, Renwal Road, Near Power House Chomu, Dis. Jaipur, Raj. 50. Akshay Kumar Khatri S/o Hira Lal, R/o B-203 Gomti Apartment, Sec 18, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer Jaipur. 51. Himmat Kumar Meena S/o Banshi Dhar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Bhagwanpura, Post- Cheeplata, Teh- Neem Ka Thana, Sikar, Raj. 52. Vaidehi Sharma D/o Shrawan Kumar Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Vimalpura, Post- Kanarpura, Via Kalader, Teh- Chomu, Jaipur. 53. Mahesh Kumar Sharma S/o Roodmal Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vimalpura, Post- Kanapura, Teh- Chomu Jaipur. 54. Vinod Gochar S/o Shyoji Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vill. Anantganj, Post- Dhowara, Teh- Hindoli, Bundi, Raj. 55. Suresh Kumar S/o Girdhari Lal Samota, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Viil. Derawali Dhani, Post Jairampura, Teh. Sri- madhopur, Sikar, Raj. 56. Manish Sharma S/o Banwari Lal Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Jatwara Dhani Girdharwas, Teh- Bassi, Jaipur, Raj. 57. Vipin Gautam S/o Prakash Chand Goutam, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 1-G-12 Mahaveer Nagar Extension, Kota. 58. Gurjar Ashok S/o Kailash Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dhabhaiyo Ka Mohalla, Harsolao Near Co-Operative Kota, Hrsolao, Medta City District Nagaur, Presently Residing At 23, Bajiya Pg, Gangaram Nagar, Gopal Pura By Pass, Jaipur. 59. Manmohan Singh Gurjar S/o Indraraj Gurjar, Aged About [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (20 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 25 Years, R/o Peepalkheda, Mahwa, Dausa. 60. Rajesh Kumar Gurjar S/o Bachhu Singh Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Basda, Geejgarh Road, Sikandra, District Dausa. 61. Ajay Varma S/o Lachhi Ram Verma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o House Number 280, Ambedkar Colony, Kunhadi Police Station, Kota. 62. Ravinder Singh S/o Ajit Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vill Kherki, Behror, Post- Gunti, District Alwar. 63. Ramavtar Meena S/o Bheema Ram Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Rang Lal Ka Pura, Teh- Todabhim, District Ka- rauli. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1025/2025 Chetan Jaiman S/o Gajanand Jaiman, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jain Mandir Mohalla, Mojpur, Po Mauj Pur, District- Alwar, Ra- jasthan 321633 ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building,durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1028/2025 Premraj Mehara S/o Jagdish Narayan Mehara, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Devgaon, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Vishanu Singh S/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vpo Pilod, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Ra- jasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (21 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 3. Sonam D/o Daleep Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Shri Krishan Nagar, Mundawar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 4. Dharemendra Kumar S/o Ram Pratap, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Kolsiya, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhun- jhunu, Rajasthan. 5. Narendra Yogi S/o Gopal Lal Yogi, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Yogi Bhawan, Bus Stand, Sirsi, District Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1029/2025 Ramkishore Jakhar S/o Arjun Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 605, Jato Ki Hathai, Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Babita Bai Bairwa D/o Khem Chand Bairwa, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Jaisinghpura, Post Karanpura, Tehsil Reni, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 3. Arun Rar S/o Mool Chand, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo Birol, Via Jhajhar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 4. Surgyan D/o Panna Ram Bijarniya, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Budsu, Makrana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. 5. Vijaypal Sewda S/o Nathu Singh Sewda, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Sewda Ki Dhani, Bhilunda, District Sikar, Ra- jasthan. 6. Ramnaresh Arya S/o Ramprasad Arya, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Beedsar, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1031/2025 Laxman Swami S/o Ramniwas Swami, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Govind Nagar, Malpura Road, Dudu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (22 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Prashant Singodiya S/o Prem Singh Singodiya, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Laxmi Chand Suman, Purani Dhani Mandi, Near Shivam Sarvodya School, District Baran, Ra- jasthan 3. Lalit Kishor S/o Brijmohan, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Vil- lage Gunjara, Post Kanwas, Tehsil Kanwas, District Kota, Rajasthan. 4. Roshan Lal Meena S/o Ramkaran Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 16 Tatkaleswar Puri Hida Ki Mori Ramganj Bazar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1032/2025 Sachin Dara S/o Zile Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Vpo Kishorpura, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Devaram Jangid S/o Ramswaroop Jangid, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Bhankrota Khurd, Post Ajairajpura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Shubham Agrawal S/o Rajendra Kumar Agrawal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 15, Behind Navjivan Hospital, Hanu- man Vatika, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1033/2025 Shiv Prakash Khangar S/o Shankar Lal Khangar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Near Of Sr. Secondary School, Ward No. 9, Tehsil Uni- yara, District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (23 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 2. Gagan Kumar S/o Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 157, Main Road, In Front Of Pnb Bank, Vpo Tatarpur, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 3. Jyoti Yadav D/o Karmveer Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Vpo Gunti, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, Ra- jasthan. 4. Sourav Parmar S/o Kana Ram Parmar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ramdev Colony, Jalore, District Jalore, Ra- jasthan. 5. Kaushal Kumar Regar S/o Ramesh Chandra Regar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ambedkar Marg, Regar Mohalla, In- site Surajpole, District Udaipur, Rajasthan 6. Mahesh Kumar Khatik S/o Ram Gopal Khatik, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Khatiko Ka Mohalla, Nangal Mode, Kunda, Amer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Devershi Mehta S/o Navneet Mehta, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 7, Laxmi Narayan Nagar, Savina, District Udaipur, Ra- jasthan. 8. Abhishek Swami S/o Parmeshwar Swami, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Behind Old Power House, Aguna Chowk, Dis- trict Bikaner, Rajasthan. 9. Shiv Shanker Baria S/o Sharwan Kumar Baria, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Near Songiri Well, Dhobi Mohalla, District Bikaner, Rajasthan. 10. Teerth Narayan Verma S/o Keshar Lal Verma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Plot No. 41, Shree Ram Nagar Colony, San- ganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 11. Sudesh Kumar Gothwal S/o Jaswant Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Behind Khatiko Ki Dharm- sala, Vpo Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 12. Sanjay S/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ari- hant Resort, Dudu Road, Brijlal Nagar, Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan. 13. Sanket Vaishnav S/o Charan Das Vaishnav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Kansaro Ka Vas, Near Hanuman Mandir, District Barmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1034/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (24 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] Rehana Bano W/o Abdul Sakur, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 36, Mohalla Chejaran Char Kutub Masjid Ke Pass, Jhunjhunu. ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technologies And Communications, Secretar- iat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Services Selection Board (Rsmssb), Through Its Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018, Rajasthan 3. Hitesh Kumar Sharma S/o Ramesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Papri, Post Sothana, Tehsil Vi- ratnagar, District Jaipur. 4. Rajesh Kumar Meena S/o Gendi Lal Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Rampura Post Boroda, Tehsil Dausa. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1035/2025 Manoj Kumar S/o Ratan Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Narsara, Tehsil Fatehpur Bathod, Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Gajendra Sharma S/o Gopal Lal Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o 79, Anand Vihar-B, Dadi Ka Phatak, Benar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Vijay Sharma S/o Hari Prasad Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Gurjar Mohalla, Tonk Road, Kherda, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 4. Suresh Kumar S/o Hemraj, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Near Sbs Library, Karanpur, Post Srikaranpur, District Sri- ganganagar, Rajasthan. 5. Saead Khan S/o Ayyub Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Nana Chok, Chawand, Tehsil Sarada, District Udaipur, Ra- jasthan. 6. Balwant Singh S/o Inder Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (25 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] Ward No. 11, 10 Slw, Silwala Khurd, Hanumangarh, Ra- jasthan. 7. Rakesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shimbhu Dayal Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Sabalpura, Post Dola Ka Bass, Via Kaladera, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 8. Mani Lal Damor S/o Dungar Lal Damor, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Annapura, Post Charwara, Block Jhon- thari, Tehsil Jhonthari, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan. 9. Dinesh Yadav S/o Kanhaiya Lal Yadav, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Mundgasa, Post Rc Khera, Tehsil Hin- doli, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 10. Mamta Meena D/o Sitaram Meena, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 6/307, Krishna Marg, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. 11. Vishvajeet Singh S/o Prathvi Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 51, Surya Colony, Near Emmanuel Mission School, Naya Gaon Road, Pali, District Pali, Rajasthan. 12. Kishan Lal S/o Girdhari Lal Mali, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Maliyon Ka Bas, Bap, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan. 13. Pawan Verma S/o Prabhulal Verma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. Ward No. 13, Lal Bai Mohalla, Vpo Mangrol, District Baran, Rajasthan. 14. Priya Vedi Verma D/o Shimbhu Dayal Vedi, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Anshul Villa B-2 -59 Sudarshan Nagar Pawanpuri, District Bikaner ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1052/2025 1. Pankaj Modi S/o Ved Prakash Modi, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Opp. 42, Adarsh Colony, Daudpur, Alwar, Rajasthan. 2. Ayush Sharma S/o Shiv Kumar Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, R/o B-35, Sharma Bhawan, Gurjar Ghati, Amer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Ajay Kumar Meena S/o Ghanshyam Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Nangal Sherpur, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 4. Ashish Khandelwal S/o Satya Narayan Khandelwal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 3 By 3, Ganesh Talab, Dadabari, Kota, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (26 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] ----Appellants Versus 1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Bhavna Sharma D/o Late Shri Indra Prakash Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, R/o A-408 Anand Lok 1St Gajadharpura Road, Kalwar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Ankit Singh S/o Ramesh Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o A-6, Deoli Arab Road, Pragati Nagar, Borkhera, Kota, Rajasthan. 4. Kapil Nagar S/o Shankar Lal Nagar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Pipliya Jagir, Post Khopar, Tehsil Chhabra, District Baran, Rajasthan. 5. Varsha Pathak D/o Ghanshyam Pathak, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 437 E, R.k. Puram, Kota, Rajasthan. 6. Jeetendra Kumar Meena S/o Sultan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Nawalpura, Post Pathena, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 7. Manmohan Suman S/o Mukut Bihari Suman, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Deoli, Via Kaithoon, Tehsil Kanwas, District Kota, Rajasthan. 8. Bhanwar Lal S/o Radha Kishan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 122, Utharadha Bas, Palot, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. 9. Harinder Singh S/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Fatehpur, Sihot Bari, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Ms.Kavita Bhati, Adv. Mr.Aamir Khan, Adv. Mr.Nikhil Kumawat, Adv. Mr.Anand Sharma, Adv. for Mr.Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr.Bhagat Singh Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Shivatma Kumar Tank, Adv. and Mr.Tarun Verma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Yuvraj Samant, Adv. with Ms.Neha Amola, Adv. & Mr.Tilak Vaid, Adv. [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (27 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU JUDGMENT 26/09/2025 AVNEESH JHINGAN, J:- With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeals are taken up for final disposal. 2. These intra court appeals are decided by a common order as the facts and issues involved are similar. For the sake of convenience, the facts are being taken from D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.960/2025. 3. The intra court appeal is filed against the order dated 03.07.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16144/2024 and other connected matters. 4. The brief facts are that the appellants applied for the post of Informatics Assistant in pursuance to advertisement dated 16.01.2023 as amended on 27.06.2024, notified by the Rajasthan Subordinate and Ministerial Service Selection Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Board’). The written examination was conducted by the Board on 21.01.2024. The paper of 100 marks comprised of 150 objective type questions. The preliminary answer key was published by the Board on 02.02.2024 and objections were invited from the candidates. The objections were received with regard to eighty nine questions. Preliminary answer key was affirmed for eighty questions, seven questions were deleted and answers of two questions including that of Question No.125 were changed. The final answer key was published on 01.07.2024 and final result was declared. The appellants filed writ [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (28 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] petition raising the grievance to change in answer of Question No.125 and unchanged answer of Question Nos.12, 50, 89 & 127. 5. Learned Single Judge after hearing the parties, perusing the pleadings and report of the subject experts dismissed the writ petition. It was held:- (i) that the scope of interference in judicial review in dispute of correctness of answer of the question in public examination is limited; (ii) no clear cut case was made to show that answers to the five questions were apparently wrong; (iii) that the court can neither substitute its opinion nor can act as an expert; and (iv) lastly that the material considered by the subject experts to consider the objections was not stated to be unreliable or unauthenticated. Hence, the present appeal. 6. Learned counsel for the appellants have pressed the challenge only to the change of answer to the question No.125. The contention is that in the books referred to in appeal the answer to the question no.125 is Dynamic RAM and not Static RAM. It is argued that in Dynamic RAM the transistor and capacitor are separately fitted whereas in Static RAM the capacitor is inbuilt in MOS transistor and the question ought to have clarified by use of term MOSFET. It is submitted that objection was not rightly considered by the expert committee. 7. As per contra, the examination was held in a fair and transparent manner, no malafide or irregularity is alleged in holding the examination. The argument is that a fair opportunity was granted to the candidates to file objections to the preliminary answer key. The committee of subject experts considered the [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (29 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] objections and on its recommendation the answer of question No.125 was changed. The report of the committee and the material relied upon to change the answer of the question is pressed into service. The submission is that scope of interference or the correctness of the answer to the question in a public examination in writ jurisdiction is limited. 8. The only issue pressed in this appeal is with regard to the change of answer to question No.125. 9. Before proceeding further, it would be appropriate to reproduce Question No.125:- “125. I am a Memory device. I am composed of transistors and capacitors. I am able to access the data fast. Who am I? (A) Dynamic ROM (B) Static RAM (C) Dynamic RAM (D) Static ROM (E) Question not attempted.” 10. In the preliminary answer sheet answer to Question No. 125 was specified as Option (C) ‘Dynamic RAM’. On considering the objections, the answer was changed to Option (B) ‘Static RAM’. 11. Learned counsel for the appellants, during pendency of the appeal while arguing the matter, sought time to further study the expert committee report and to have instructions from the clients. Learned counsel for the appellants on instructions from clients submit that it is not disputed that both Dynamic RAM and Static RAM have transistors and capacitors but the difference is that in Static RAM the transistors used have inbuilt capacitors [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (30 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] whereas Dynamic RAM is composed of a separate transistor and capacitor therefore the correct answer was only Dynamic Ram. 12. The material relied upon by the expert committee is reproduced below:- “Justifying for the validity of the Statement "SRAM is composed of Transistors and Capacitors" The justification is grounded in the principle of transitive relationships in logical reasoning and in the technical understanding of the structure and components of SRAM. The logical flow and technical explanation of the components that make up SRAM will be outlined to demonstrate the validity of the statement. Statement of Facts: 1. SRAM Composition: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) consists of memory cells made from MOS Transistors. 2. MOS Transistors in SRAM: An SRAM cell typically uses a configuration of 6 MOS transistors to form a flip-flop circuit that enables data storage. These transistors are responsible for switching the stored state. 3. Role of Capacitors in SRAM: While SRAM cells primarily rely on transistors for their data storage and access functions, capacitors (MOS capacitors) are part of the metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs, MOS-FETs, MOS FETs, or MOS transistors). Sources: 1. Semiconductor Devices Physics and Technology S. M. SZE and M. K. LEE JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC ISBN 978-0470-53794-7 Link: Page 172 First Paragraph Line 4 "The metaloxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) is composed of an MOS capacitor and two p-n junctions placed immediately adjacent to the MOS capacitor" 2. Modern Semiconductor Devices for Integrated Circuits Chenming Calvin Hu Prentice Hall 2010 ISBN:9780136085256, 0136085253 Link: Page 158 Figure 5.2 "An MOS transistor is an MOS capacitor with PN junctions at two ends" 3. Semiconductor Physics and Devices Donald A. Neamen McGraw-Hill, Fourth Edition, 2011 ISBN 978-0-07- 352958-5 [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (31 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] Link: Page 371, Fourth Last Line "The MOS capacitor is the heart of the MOSFET" 4. Semiconductor device fundamentals. Pierret, R. F. Addison-Wesley, Second Edition, 1996 Link: Page 621, Chapter 17, Section 17.1 "Physically, the MOSFET is essentially nothing more than an MOS-capacitor with two pn junctions placed immediately adjacent to the regions of the semiconductor controlled by the MOS-gate. 4. MOS Capacitors and MOS Transistors: The MOS transistors (used in SRAM) contain MOS Capacitors as part them. Specifically, the MOS capacitor is a fundamental part which formed between the gate (metal), oxide (insulating layer), and semiconductor (channel) of the transistor, and plays an essential role in controlling the flow of current. 5. Transitive Property: The principle of transitive relations in logic asserts that if: • A is related to B, and (A is composed of B) • B is related to C, then, (B is composed of C) • A is related to C. (A is composed of C) Source: MATHEMATICS Textbook for Class XII PART I Chapter 1 Relation and Functions Page 2 https://ncert.nic.in/textbook.php?lemhl=1-6 Definition 3 A relation R in a set A is called (i) reflexive, if (a, a) ER, for every a E A, (ii) symmetric, if (a1, a2) E R implies that (a2, a1) ER, for all a1, a2 E A. (iii) transitive, if (a1, a2) E R and (a2, a3) E R implies that (a1, a3) E R, for all a1, a2, a3 EA. Therefore, following this principle: • SRAM is composed of MOS transistors. • MOS transistors are composed of MOS capacitors. • SRAM is composed of MOS transistors and MOS capacitors. (Transitivity) • MOS transistor is a Transistor. • MOS capacitor is a Capacitor. • Hence, SRAM is composed of transistors and capacitors. Justification of Validity:- 1. Logical Flow: The statement "SRAM is composed of transistors and capacitors" is logically sound because it follows directly from the composition of MOS transistors (which are composed of MOS capacitors) and the use of [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (32 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] capacitors in SRAM functionality. Thus, it is accurate to claim that SRAM is made up of both transistors and capacitors. 2. Scientific and Technical Context: In semiconductor technology, the composition of SRAM cells fundamentally relies on MOS transistors, which themselves contain MOS capacitors. Therefore, capacitors (MOS capacitors) are en essential part of the transistor and contribute to the SRAM composition. 3. Transitivity Applied: • SRAM composed of MOS transistors → • MOS transistors composed of MOS capacitors → • Therefore, SRAM composed of transistors and capacitors. This transitive relationship provides a logical and scientifically valid basis for the statement. Conclusion:- In conclusion, the statement “SRAM is composed of transistors and capacitors” is logically and scientifically valid based on the transitive relationship between the components of SRAM. While MOS transistors are the primary building blocks for SRAM cells, and the MOS capacitors are part of the transistors, the capacitors are undeniably integral to the structure of the transistors that make up the SRAM. As such, SRAM can be correctly described as being composed of both transistors and capacitors, as this is a consequence of the transitive property applied to the structure of the components involved.” 13. The expert committee after considering the relevant material and books concluded that both Dynamic RAM and Static RAM are composed of transistor and capacitor. At this stage, it would be important to note that question No.125 consisted of two parts:- firstly, the composition of component of transistor and capacitors and second part the ability of the component to access the data fast. If the first part of the question is read in isolation the Static RAM and Dynamic RAM both shall qualify as correct answers but the deciding factor was the second part of the question which ousted the option of Dynamic RAM. [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (33 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 14. The contention raised by the appellant cannot be gone into in writ jurisdiction, as it tantamount to the Court substituting its own opinion for that of the expert committee. The scope of interference in judicial review in a challenge to the correctness of the answer key is well settled and the following decisions of the Supreme Court are referred:- 14.1 In U.P.P.S.C, through its Chairman & Anr. Vs. Rahul Singh & Anr. reported in [2018 INSC 554] the Court held that restraint should be exercised by the courts in entertaining the challenge to the correctness of the answer key. The relevant paras of the judgment is:- “12. The law is well settled that the onus is on the candidate to not only demonstrate that the key answer is incorrect but also that it is a glaring mistake which is totally apparent and no inferential process or reasoning is required to show that the key answer is wrong. The Constitutional Courts must exercise great restraint in such matters and should be reluctant to entertain a plea challenging the correctness of the key answers. In Kanpur University case (supra), the Court recommended a system of-(1) moderation; (2) avoiding ambiguity in the questions; (3) prompt decisions be taken to exclude suspected questions and no marks be assigned to such questions. 13. As far as the present case is concerned even before publishing the first list of key answers the Commission had got the key answers moderated by two expert committees. Thereafter, objections were invited and a 26 member committee was constituted to verify the objections and after this exercise the Committee recommended that 5 questions be deleted and in 2 questions, key answers be changed. It can be presumed that these [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (34 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] committees consisted of experts in various subjects for which the examinees were tested. Judges cannot take on the role of experts in academic matters. Unless, the candidate demonstrates that the key answers are patently wrong on the face of it, the courts cannot enter into the academic field, weigh the pros and cons of the arguments given by both sides and then come to the conclusion as to which of the answer is better or more correct.” 14.2 In Ran Vijay Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. reported in [(2018)2 SCC 357] it was held that re-evaluation or scrutiny of answer sheet should only be permitted in exceptional or rare case on demonstration of an error committed without the inferential process of reasoning or rationalization. The relevant para of the judgment is quoted:- “30. The law on the subject is therefore, quite clear and we only propose to highlight a few significant conclusions. They are: 30.1 If a statute, Rule or Regulation governing an examination permits the re-evaluation of an answer sheet or scrutiny of an answer sheet as a matter of right, then the authority conducting the examination may permit it; 30.2If a statute, Rule or Regulation governing an examination does not permit re-evaluation or scrutiny of an answer sheet (as distinct from prohibiting it) then the Court may permit re-evaluation or scrutiny only if it is demonstrated very clearly, without any "inferential process of reasoning or by a process of rationalisation" and only in rare or exceptional cases that a material error has been committed, 30.3 The court should not at all re-evaluate or scrutinize the answer sheets of a candidate-it has no expertise in the matter and academic matters are best left to academics; 30.4 The court should presume the correctness of the key answers and proceed on that assumption; and [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (35 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] 30.5 In the event of a doubt, the benefit should go to the examination authority rather than to the candidate.” 14.3 In Vikesh Kumar Gupta & Another Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in [(2021)2 SCC 309] it was held that the courts should be very cautious to interfere with expert opinion in academic matters. The relevant para is:- “17. A perusal of the above judgments would make it clear that courts should be very slow in interfering with expert opinion in academic matters. In any event, assessment of the questions by the courts itself to arrive at correct answers is not permissible. The delay in finalization of appointments to public posts is mainly caused due to pendency of cases challenging selections pending in courts for a long period of time. The cascading effect of delay in appointments is the continuance of those appointed on temporary basis and their claims for regularization. The other consequence resulting from delayed appointments to public posts is the serious damage caused to administration due to lack of sufficient personnel.” 15. The material relied upon by the expert committee for considering the objections remained unchallenged. In view of the conclusions reached by the expert committee, the reliance placed by the appellants on certain textbooks shall be of no avail. 16. The appellants have taken us through the material relied upon by the expert committee, but have failed to establish that the conclusion arrived at by the expert committee is on the face of it erroneous that too without any inferential process or reasoning. Taking the case of the appellants at the highest, the argument is that the earlier answer was also correct but for [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (36 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] interference in writ jurisdiction the test is that answer is patently wrong on the face of it. The appellant have failed to prima facie show that no reasonable body of expert of subject would accept Static RAM to be the correct answer and that the procedure adopted by the Board of inviting objections to the preliminary answer key was not fair. Reliance is placed on the judgment of the Apex Court in Ran Vijay Singh (supra) wherein after considering the decision in Kanpur University Vs. Samir Gupta reported in [(1983)4 SCC 309] it was held that it must be demonstrated that no reasonable body of men well-versed with the subject would regard the answer to be correct. It was held:- “The key answer should be assumed to be correct unless it is proved to be wrong and that it should not be held to be wrong by an inferential process of reasoning or by a process of rationalisation. It must be clearly demonstrated to be wrong, that is to say, it must be such as no reasonable body of men well-versed in the particular subject would regard as correct.” In other words, the onus is on the candidate to clearly demonstrate that the key answer is incorrect and that too without any inferential process or reasoning. The burden on the candidate is therefore rather heavy and the constitutional courts must be extremely cautious in entertaining a plea challenging the correctness of a key answer.” 17. In the case of Ran Vijay Singh (supra) it is held that answer in key should be presumed to be correct and in case of doubt the benefit should go to the examination authority rather than the candidate as held. 18. The contention raised that in case inbuilt capacitor as is used in MOS Transistor was to be considered the term MOSFET [2025:RJ-JP:39946-DB] (37 of 37) [SAW-960/2025] should have been used in the question, is in fact a grievance that the question could have been phrased accurately. The contention does not fall within the scope of judicial scrutiny in writ jurisdiction of the correctness of the answer key. 19. The expert committee having examined the answer key and arrived at a reasoned conclusion leaves no scope for interference by this Court in the exercise of its writ jurisdiction. Given the well-settled principles governing judicial review of answer keys in public examinations, the learned Single Judge was justified in declining to interfere with the findings of the expert committee more so, in absence of challenge to the material relied by the expert committee. 20. No case is made out for interference in the intra court appeals, the same are dismissed. 21. All pending misc. applications, if any, stand disposed of. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Himanshu Soni/Riya/53-72 Reportable:- Yes