Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48782 WP No. 6679 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 6679 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
GOVINDASWAMY S/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO. 121, RAJKUMAR ROAD, WARD NO. 4, KOTE, NEW EXTENSION, KENGERI, BENGALURU - 560 060. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SHASHIDHAR BELAGUMBA, ADV., -ABSENT) AND:
1.
N. RAJAMMA D/O. SMT. JAYALAXMI @ MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.148, VASUDHA NILAYA SHANTIVILAS LAYOUT, BEHIND BETHASTA SCHOOL, KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN, BENGALURU - 560 060.
2. VENKATESH S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.
3.
SMT. SHAILAJA D/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS.
4. KRISHNA S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.
5.
SMT. KALAVATHI S/O. NARAYANAPPA,
Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48782 WP No. 6679 of 2023
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS.
RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 5 ARE R/AT NO.121, RAJKUMAR ROAD WARD NO.4, KOTE NEW EXTENSION, KENGERI, BENGALURU - 560 060.
6.
SMT. S. KAMALA W/O V. DESHI KASHARI, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NO.C101, ARVIND ARSHIRVAD, KODIGEHALLI MAIN ROAD, SAHAKARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 092. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMON ORDER DTD 24/02/2023 ON I.A.NO. 4/2022 FILED U/SEC 47 R/W 151 CPC ALTHOUGH TEH R-1 / DHR FILED AN I.A. U/SEC 54 OF C.P.C IN F.D.P.NO. 25028/2020 PASSED BY THE XXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE AT MAYO HALL UNIT, (CCH-29) BENGALURU VIDE ANNEXURE-E.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
ORAL ORDER
1. Matter is being listed for the fourth time for non- compliance of office objections. The cost imposed by this Court on 27.10.2023 is also not deposited by the petitioner till date.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48782 WP No. 6679 of 2023
2. The matter is called twice. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Under the circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE
DN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5