Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42282 (CHH)

LAKESHWAR PRASAD v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4729/2025 · 2025-09-03

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45180 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4729 of 2025 1 - Lakeshwar Prasad S/o Late Pukram Mahesh, Aged About 51 Years R/o Village And Post- Nariyara Tahsil Malkharouda P.S. Hasoud Distt. Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector, Sakti, Distt. Sakti (C.G.) 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (R)/ Land Acquisition Officer Malkharouda, Distt. Sakti (C.G.) 5 - Executive Engineer (B/r), Public Works Department, Division Sakti, Distt. Sakti (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 04/09/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following relief: “10.1. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/order/direction, directing the respondent no. 3 Collector 2 Sakti to refer the case of petitioner forthwith to the learned Tribunal constituted u/s 51 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for decision in accordance with law. 10.2 That, if the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to petitioner’s matter. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s), which is deemed fit and proper in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a direction to respondent no. 3 to decide the representation made by the petitioner on 20.11.2024 (Annexure P/2) expeditiously within a time frame. 3. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection in this regard. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of the counsels for the respective parties, respondent no. 3 is directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner on 20.11.2024 (Annexure P/2), in accordance with law, rules and 3 regulations, expeditiously preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the petition stands disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the case. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima