Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42269 (RAJ)

JAGDISH ALIAS JAKHADA S/O SHRI RATANLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13114/2025 · 2025-10-17

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13114/2025 Jagdish Alias Jakhada S/o Shri Ratanlal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Harirampura, Bassi, Police Station Bassi, Jaipur East. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shantanu Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl.GA/PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner in connection with FIR No.240/2025, registered at Police Station Jaisinghpura Khor, District Jaipur City (North) wherein he is charged for offences punishable under Sections 304(2) BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the alleged offence is triable by Magistrate and the co-accused person namely Kailashi Devi has been granted indulgence of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.08.2025. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since the date of his arrest and after investigation charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submits that three other criminal cases are (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13114/2025] pending against the petitioner, therefore, he does not deserve indulgence of bail. 4. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the alleged offence is triable by Magistrate and the co-accused person namely Kailashi Devi has been granted indulgence of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 28.08.2025 and looking to the fact that the petitioner is in custody since the date of his arrest and after investigation charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 5. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Jagdish Alias Jakhada S/o Shri Ratanlal arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, in case the petitioner is found involved in committing and repeating the same offence again, the Public Prosecutor/Investigation Officer would be at liberty to move application for cancellation of bail before the jurisdictional Court. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/217