Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42263 (ALL)

NAZIM BAIG v. STATE OF U.P. AND 13 OTHERS

WRIC/11505/2025 · 2025-04-16

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:56837-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11505 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nazim Baig Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar,Bakhteyar Yusuf Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. The present writ petition is misconceived as it primarily deals with the dispute between persons. The petitioner has a remedy to file first information report against the persons from whom he is allegedly receiving threats. 3. In light of the same, we are of the view that no interference is required by this Court at this stage, and accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the correct authorities for redressal of his grievance. Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Dev (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad