[2025:RJ-JP:41448-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc 3rd Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 1809/2025 in S. B. Criminal Appeal No.2688/2023 Haricharan Meena S/o Shri Phoolchand, R/o Karanpur, Police Station Raini, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishan Kumar Chhawal, Advocate. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, Additional Government Advocate. Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Additional Government Advocate. Mr. Anil Kumar Jain, Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 10/10/2025 1. The matter is heard on the third application seeking suspension of sentence. 2. Counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant- accused has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment ten years for the offence punishable under Section 4/18 of POCSO Act. 3. Counsel for the accused-applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect [2025:RJ-JP:41448-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-1809/2025] that accused-applicant is in judicial custody. Counsel for the applicant-accused submits that the applicant-accused has been falsely implicated in this matter and the appeal is not likely to be heard in near future. It is accordingly prayed that the substantive sentence imposed upon the applicant-accused be suspended during the pendency of the appeal. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the application seeking suspension of sentence. 5. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and looking to the age of the deceased and the victim as well as statement of PW-2 and Suicide Note (Ex.P-10), in our considered view, no case is made out to suspend the sentence of the accused-applicant. 7. In that view of the matter, the present (third) application for suspension of sentence stands dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/13