Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42260 (AP)

KANCHARANA SAROJINI, VISAKHAPATNAM v. PRL SECY, REVENUE DEPT,. HYD & 4 OT

WP/3046/2016 · 2025-10-30

Cheekati Manavendranath Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010427282016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY WRIT PETITION Between: 1. KANCHARANA SAROJINI, VISAKHAPATNAM, W/O SURYANARAYANA AGED 53 YEARS R/O D.NO. 39 MADHAVADHARA VISAKHAPATNAM 1. PRL SECY REVENUE DEPT HYD 4 OT, GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM, 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER VISAKHAPATNAM, 4. THE TAHSILDAR URBAN VISAKHAPATNAM, 5. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondents in not regularizing the petitioner's land of an extent of 200 Sq.Yds. bearing D.No. 39-17-1/3, Plot No. 46 admeasuring 200 Sq.Yds. in Sy.No. 39/1A1/1A3 Rart, Ward No. 41A (New Ward No. 39) Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District in pursuance IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY WRIT PETITION NO: 3046/2016 KANCHARANA SAROJINI, VISAKHAPATNAM, W/O SURYANARAYANA AGED 53 YEARS R/O D.NO. 39 MADHAVADHARA VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND PRL SECY REVENUE DEPT HYD 4 OT, GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR VISAKHAPATNAM, THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER VISAKHAPATNAM, THE TAHSILDAR URBAN VISAKHAPATNAM, - VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one he nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondents in not regularizing the petitioner's land of an extent of 200 Sq.Yds. bearing D.No. 1/3, Plot No. 46 admeasuring 200 Sq.Yds. in Sy.No. 39/1A1/1A3 Rart, Ward No. 41A (New Ward No. 39), Assessment No. 100004/90240 situate at Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District in pursuance IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3163] THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY KANCHARANA SAROJINI, VISAKHAPATNAM, W/O SURYANARAYANA AGED 53 YEARS R/O D.NO. 39-19-23, ...PETITIONER PRL SECY REVENUE DEPT HYD 4 OT, GOVERNMENT REVENUE THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER VISAKHAPATNAM, - VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one he nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the Respondents in not regularizing the petitioner's land of an extent of 200 Sq.Yds. bearing D.No. 1/3, Plot No. 46 admeasuring 200 Sq.Yds. in Sy.No. 39/1A1/1A3 Rart, , Assessment No. 100004/90240 situate at Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District in pursuance 2 CMR,J W.P.No.3046 of 2016 of G.O.Ms.No. 747 Revenue (UC.I) Department dated 18.06.2008 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the Respondents to regularize the petitioner's land as per G.O.Ms.No. 747 Revenue (UC.I) Department dated 18.06.2008 in the interests of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 3859 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to create any third party interest more particularly in favour of 5th respondent in respect of petitioner's land of an extent of 200 Sq. Yards bearing D.No.39-17-1/3, Plot No. 46, admeasuring 200 Sq. Yard sin Sy.No.39/1A1/1A3 Part, Ward No. 41A (New Ward No. 3o9) Assessment No. 100004/90240 situated at Madhavadhara Village, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal fo the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC For VUDA and MUDA 3 CMR,J W.P.No.3046 of 2016 The Court made the following: ORDER: Mr. R.Praveen Kumar, learned counsel representing Mr. K.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY Date: 31.10.2025 MDP