Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040002312025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/65/2025 M/s T D Enterprises represented by Shri Tanti Nade, Son of Shri Nade Lugu, resident of Panch Ali Lobi, Po and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh authorized Special Power of Attorney Holder of M/s T D Enterprise, Head Office at Gandhi market, Daporijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors represented by the Secretary, Rural Works Department Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Arunachal Rural Roads Development Agency RWD Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Superintendent Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Works Circle Papum Pare District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Executive Engineer cum PIU Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Works Department Laaying Yangte Division Kurung Kumey District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh.
Page No.# 2/3 5:The Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : Tender Evaluation Board (Technical and Financial) for NIT Dated 14.03.2024 issued by the EE cum PIU RWD Laaying Yangte Kurung kumey District Arunachal Pradesh for construction of road form Ruba PMGSY Road to Katuk bearing package No. AR/14/02/020 6:M/s Balaji Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Yukar Taw resident of Papu Nallah PO Naharlagun PS Papu Hill Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:M/s Mepung Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Nabam Ralo resident of Forest Colony Sagalee PO and PS Sagalee Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Jambey Tsering, Tayom Gamoh,Licha Teni,Logsang Yountan,Gotu Riba Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak, SC (RWD)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 24-02-2025 Mr. G. Riba, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to
Page No.# 3/3 file a fresh.
The prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant