Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42255 (RAJ)

MAYANK S/O KULDEEP v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13136/2025 · 2025-10-17

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42649] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13136/2025 Mayank S/o Kuldeep, R/o Nangal Khodiya, Tehsil Behror. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-Addl.G.A cum PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 17/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioner in connection with the FIR No. 861/2017 registered at Police Station Bahror District Alwar wherein he has been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 307 and 427 of IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act and subsequently he has been charged for the offences under Sections 307, 427 and 34 of IPC and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation of causing firearm has been levelled against the other accused persons namely Ankit Yadav and Bheem Singh who have already been granted indulgence of bail by this Court. Counsel submits that the case of the petitioner is at par with the case of co- accused person and rather on better footing. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of [2025:RJ-JP:42649] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13136/2025] his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4 Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that there is no allegation of causing firearm injury against the petitioner by the injured and also looking to the fact that the co-accused persons namely Ankit Yadav and Bheem Singh have already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and also considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Mayank S/o Kuldeep arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing, as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/229