DR,J W.P.No.29716 of 2025 APHC010570592025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29716 OF 2025 Between: 1. GOPISETTY VENKATESWARALU, S/o Venkata rangham Venkata rangaiah, Gudimetta Village, Racherla Mandal, Prakasam District, ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its. Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of AP,AP Secretariat, Velaapudi, Guntur District, AP. 2. The District Magistrate and District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole, AP,523001 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer RDO, Markapur, Prakasam District, A.P, 523316 4. The Tahsildar Giddalur Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh 523357. 5. The Village Revenue Officer VRO, Giddalur Mandal, Prakasam District, A P - 523357. ...Respondents DR,J W.P.No.29716 of 2025 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not F-Line Application No. DER012501569274, dated NO.TMUT250909044408, and considering the petitioners 09.09.2025 and Mutation Application TMUT250909042274, dated 09.09.2025 for rectification of online entries in 1- and Adangal Pahani connected to my total lands of the survey, B(ROR) demarcation, and fixation of boundaries, and for mutation of petitioner name the records in Sy. No. 184, Ac. 0.58 cents and Sy. No. 185/1, Ac. 0.68 cents situated at Giddalur Village, and not conducting survey, demarcation, and fixation of boundaries, and not mutation of petitioner name in the revenue records is 19 (i)(g), 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and in violation of Article. 14 violation of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and A.P. Books Rules, 1989 consequently, direct the(Rights in Land) and Pattadar passrespondents to conduct survey, demarcation and fixation of boundaries and mutate the petitioners name in the revenue records in Sy. No. 184, Ac. 0.58 cents and Sy. No. 185/1, Ac. 0.68 cents situated at Giddalur Village, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents to consider petitioner representations dated 09.09.2025 and the petitioner F-Line Application No. DER012501569274, dated 09.09.2025 and Mutation Application NO.TMUT250909044408, and TMUT2509n9042274, dated 09.09.2025 within 4 weeks and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: TANGIRALA K PADMAJA DEVI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUEThe DR,J W.P.No.29716 of 2025 The Court made the following ORDER: 1. The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief “…to issue a nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not F-Line Application No. DER012501569274, dated NO.TMUT250909044408, and considering the petitioners 09.09.2025 and Mutation Application TMUT250909042274, dated 09.09.2025 for rectification of online entries in 1- and Adangal Pahani connected to my total lands of the survey, B(ROR) demarcation, and fixation of boundaries, and for mutation of petitioner name the records in Sy. No. 184, Ac. 0.58 cents and Sy. No. 185/1, Ac. 0.68 cents situated at Giddalur Village, and not conducting survey, demarcation, and fixation of boundaries, and not mutation of petitioner name in the revenue records is 19 (i)(g), 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and in violation of Article. 14 violation of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and A.P. Books Rules, 1989 consequently, direct the(Rights in Land) and Pattadar passrespondents to conduct survey, demarcation and fixation of boundaries and mutate the petitioners name in the revenue records in Sy. No. 184, Ac. 0.58 cents and Sy. No. 185/1, Ac. 0.68 cents situated at Giddalur Village…” 2. Heard arguments of Smt. T.K.Padmaja Devi, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner filed an F-Line application on 09.09.2025, but the respondents are not considering the same 4. After notice, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents, on instructions, submits that the said application has been considered and rejected by the endorsement dated 26.09.2025. DR,J W.P.No.29716 of 2025 5. In view of the said circumstances, as the prayer in the writ petition is already been considered by the respondents, nothing survives in this writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum if so aggrieved by the order. As a sequel, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________ JUSTICE D RAMESH Date: 17.11.2025 Dvs DR,J W.P.No.29716 of 2025 124 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 29716 OF 2025 Date: 17.11.2025 Dvs