Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42252 (RAJ)

KARNEL SINGH S/O CHAJU SINGH v. JAGMAL SINGH S/O MUKHARAM

CSA/375/2022 · 2025-10-09

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41223] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 375/2022 Karnel Singh S/o Chaju Singh, Aged About 65 Years, Occupation Thekadar, R/o D-56, Second-B, Khetri Nagar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. Jagmal Singh S/o Mukharam, Aged About 57 Years, Occupation Thekedari, R/o Kharkhada, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 2. Hindustan Copper Limited, Through Chairman, Hindustan Copper Limited, Kolkata. 3. Executive Director, Khetri Copper Complex, Khetri Nagar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 4. Senior Manager (Finance), Hindustan Copper Limited, Khetri Copper Complex, Khetri Nagar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Ms. Swati Sharma for Mr. Subhash Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijayant Nirwan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 09/10/2025 1. Plaintiff claimed his rights on the basis of unregistered partnership deed and his plaint came to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, vide order dated 23.11.2012 whereagainst appeal filed by plaintiff has also been dismissed vide judgment dated 18.08.2022. Now, plaintiff has preferred this Civil Second Appeal. 2. Counsel for the appellant having instructions from the appellant-plaintiff seeks permission to withdraw the instant appeal. [2025:RJ-JP:41223] (2 of 2) [CSA-375/2022] 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/46