APHC010537052013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 8680/2013 Between: 1. K.RAMAIAH, S/O. NARSAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC: ASST. ENGINEER (H) (DISMISSED) R/O H.NO. 10-303A, RAMA LAXMANA VEEDHI MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF AP REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (HOUSING), SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, URDU GALLI, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYDERABAD 3. THE AP STATE HOUSING CORPORATION LTD, URDUGALLY, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYDERABAD, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in imposing the punishment of dismissal from service by the respondent No.3 vide proceedings No.5448/APSHCL/Vig (3)/PKM/2007 dated 15.03.2008 and further confirmed by the respondent No.2 vide memo No. 5448/APSHCL/Vig (3)/PKM/2007 dated 01.07.2008 and respondent No.1 vide proceedings No. Memorandum No. 2427/Vig Cell /2008-3 dated 21.01.2009 as arbitrary and illegal, contrary to the enquiry report and also violation of principal of natural justice consequently set aside the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits including the back wages and all other attendant benefits or to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 10828 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the matter by fixing an early date of hearing or to pass IA NO: 3 OF 2013(WPMP 48293 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVI KUMAR VADLAKONDA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY 2. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY(SC FOR APSHC) 3. GP FOR HOUSING The Court made the following: ORDER The above writ petition was filed challenging the dismissal of the petitioner from the service by the 3rd respondent vide Proceedings No.5448/APSCHL/Vig(3)/PKM/2007 dated 15.03.2008 confirmed by the 2nd respondent vide Memo No.5448/APSCHL/Vig(3)/PKM/2007, dated 01.07.2008 and further confirmed by the 1st respondent’s proceedings vide Memorandum No.2427/Vig.Cell/2008-3, dated 21.01.2009, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The writ petition was admitted on 23.03.2013. Thereafter the matter was referred to National Lok Adalat, however, the same was not settled and hence, the matter was directed to be listed before the Court. The writ petition was listed on 14.11.2025 and on that day none appeared for the petitioner. Thereafter the matter was listed on 28.11.2025 and none appeared for the petitioner. Thereafter, the matter was listed on 05.12.2025, 12.12.2025 and 19.12.2025 and there was no representation for the petitioner on the said dates. Even today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the writ petition. 3. In view of the same, the writ petition is Dismissed for Non- Prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD