JAYAN KUMAR S/O SHRI SATISH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12119/2025 · 2025-10-09
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42244 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42244 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41064] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12119/2025 Jayan Kumar S/o Shri Satish Kumar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Bilahedi, Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aayush Goyal Mr. Rohit Tantia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Prakash, CI, P.S.- Lal Kothi, Jaipur HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 09/10/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.75/2025 registered at Police Station Lal Kothi, Jaipur City (East) for offence under Sections 3, 4 of the Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair-means) Act, 1992 and Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(2) and 61(2) of BNS-
2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He contended that allegation against the petitioner is that in his place another person appeared in the examination of B.Sc. Part-Second Semester. He argued that the said person who appeared in place of the
[2025:RJ-JP:41064] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12119/2025] petitioner has been enlarged on bail. The petitioner is tender age of 19 years and looking to his career and future prospects no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him in further custody. The petitioner is behind the bars since 25.08.2025 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Jayan Kumar S/o Shri Satish Kumar be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg /137