- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48730 WP No. 10603 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 10603 OF 2023 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MUNISWAMY S/O. LATE LINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHANKARADEVIHALLI VILLAGE, C N PURA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK-572 216 TUMKUR DISTRICT. 2. KAVITHA D/O. LATE.NINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHANKARADEVIHALLI VILLAGE, C N PURA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK-572216 TUMKUR DISTRICT. 3. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O. LATE LINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHANKARADEVIHALLI VILLAGE, C N PURA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK-572216 TUMKUR DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KRISHNA B J.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48730 WP No. 10603 of 2023 REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR-572 101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TUMKUR SUB DIVISION, TUMKUR TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 101. 4. THE TAHSILDAR GUBBI TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, M G ROAD, GUBBI, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 216. 5. SRI CHANNEGOWDA S/O. LATE KAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHANKARADEVIHALLI VILLAGE, C N PURA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK-572 216 TUMKUR DISTRICT. 6. SRI MAHALINGEGOWDA S/O. LATE SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHANKARADEVIHALLI VILLAGE, C N PURA HOBLI, GUBBI TALUK-572 216 TUMKUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48730 WP No. 10603 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED IN RP 82/21, DATED 10.10.2022 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR DISTRICT VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER No representation on behalf of the petitioners when the matter is called out. 2. This Court vide order dated 14.11.2025 has passed the following order; "Office objections have not been complied with, despite several opportunities granted. It is made clear that if office objections are not cleared by the next date of hearing, the Court would be constrained to pass appropriate orders. List this matter in 'orders' list for dismissal on 25.11.2025." 3. Today also counsel for the petitioners is absent when the matter is called out. This would clearly indicate that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48730 WP No. 10603 of 2023 matter. Hence, petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE RU, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65