APHC010533102003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 16392/2003 Between: 1. K.RAMACHARI, S/O K.AMBANNA ACHARY GOLDSMITH R/O D.NO.11-466., BRAHMIN STREET., ADONI., KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF, ENDOWMENTS., HYDERABAD. 2. B RAMMOHAN RAO, PERSON IN MANAGEMENT., GROUP TEMPLES., DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS., ADONI., KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.G3/8711/2003-I(4) dated 23-4-2003 issued by the Ist respondent as illegal, arbitrary without notice and violative of Article 14,25 and 26 of the Constitution of India and also principles of natural justice and consequently set-aside the same by directing the respondents not to interfere with the management of the institution by the board of trustees consisting of Viswabrahmin Community IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 3176 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the Interim direction granted in WPMP.No. 20339 of 2003 in W.P.No. 16392 of 2003, dated 6-8-2003 ordering Status-Quo , IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 20339 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.G3/8711/2003-I(4) dated 23-4- 2003 issued by the Ist respondent IA NO: 3 OF 2003(WPMP 32141 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KARNAM RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G RAMANA RAO (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS RAYALASEEMAREGION) 2. G RAMA RAO 3. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following Order: Heard Sri Karanam Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the writ petitions would not survive for adjudication and no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petitions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date:04.12.2025 JAK THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA 63 WRIT PETITION NO: 16392/2003 04.12.2025 JAK