Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42238 (RAJ)

GANGARAM S/O MEETHA LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12457/2025 · 2025-10-09

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41229] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12457/2025 1. Gangaram S/o Meetha Lal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Village Hindwad, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). 2. Shanti Lal S/o Gangaram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Hindwad, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). 3. Banwari S/o Gangaram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Hindwad, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP Mr. Umesh Dixit HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 09/10/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.119/2025 registered at Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawaimadhopur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) & 352 of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in [2025:RJ-JP:41229] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12457/2025] this case. Learned counsel further submits that the injuries sustained to the injured person(s) are not opined to be dangerous to life and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioners. He further submits that the accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the injuries sustained to the injured person(s) are not opined to be dangerous to life; perused the material available on record, the accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioners namely 1.Gangaram S/o Meetha Lal 2. Shanti Lal S/o Gangaram 3. Banwari S/o Gangaram is ordered to be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /9