IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 109 Lakhwider Kaur and others State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to grant statutory pay scale to the petitioners as per the Punjab Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, with regard to which reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in others vs. State of Punjab and another allowed on 13.09.2024 against which LPA dismissed on 10.12.2024. petition, a submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Lakhwider Kaur and others Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Pardeep Singh Mirpur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to grant statutory pay scale to the petitioners as per the Punjab Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, with regard to which reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in others vs. State of Punjab and another, CWP allowed on 13.09.2024 against which LPA dismissed on 10.12.2024. Regarding the claim raised in the present , a representation dated 05.11.2024, Annexure P which has yet not evoked any response. instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9533-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 04.04.2025 ....Petitioners ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate, Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to grant statutory pay scale to the petitioners as per the Punjab Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2009, with regard to which reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court in Saurabh Sharma and , CWP-15896-2023, which was allowed on 13.09.2024 against which LPA-2977-2024 has also been egarding the claim raised in the present representation dated 05.11.2024, Annexure P-7, has been which has yet not evoked any response. Learned counsel, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.04 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-9533-2025 -2- 2. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 05.11.2024, taking note of the aforesaid judgment, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to them and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioners shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 04.04.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.04 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.