Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42229 (CHH)

DEEPAK DANG v. INDIAL OIL CORPORATION LIMITED

WPC/5509/2024 · 2025-09-22

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:48729 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5509 of 2024 Deepak Dang S/o Late Sudarshan Kumar Dang Aged About 59 Years R/o Village No. 70, Salasar Greens, Sarona, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Indian Oil Corporation Limited Through Its Chief Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Raipur Divisional Office, Indian Oil Bhavan, Rajiv Ghandhi Marg, V.I.P. Road, Telhibandha, Raipur, Chattisgarh. 2 - Chief Divisional Retail Sales Manager Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Raipur Divisional Office, Indian Oil Bhavan, Rajiv Ghandhi Marg, V.I.P. Road, Telhibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ankur Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Anand Shukla, Advocate along with Miss Shruti Jha, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 23/09/2025 1. At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he would confine to his prayer to the extent that the respondents may be directed to decide the pending representation of the ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.09.24 15:19:13 +0530 2 / 2 petitioner Annexure P/16 dated 10/09/2024. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that they have no objection in deciding the representation of the petitioner dated 10/09/2024. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 4. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the no objection given by the State counsel, it is directed that the respondent No.2 shall decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P/16 dated 10/09/2024 in accordance with law. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu