Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42229 (BOM)

ASHOK PASGONDA PATIL v. VIDHYADHAR APPASAHEB PATIL

IA/750/2025 · 2025-01-21

Gauri Godse

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27-IA-750-2025.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 750 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 159 OF 2008 Ashok Pasgonda Patil … Applicant Vs. Vidhyadhar Appasaheb Patil and Others … Respondents Ms. Anu C. Kaladharan h/f. Ms. Anjali N. Helekar for Applicant/Original Respondent No. 1. Mr. Raj S. Satam i/b. Mr. Prajakt M. Arjunwadkar for Respondents CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 21st JANUARY 2025 ORDER : 1. This application is for fixing early date of hearing, Office remark indicates that the second appeal is still not ready for final hearing. Hence, date for final hearing of the second appeal cannot be fixed at this stage. 2. Learned Advocate for the appellant is granted four weeks time to take steps to serve the unserved respondents. 3. Interim Application stands disposed of. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 1/1 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2025.01.23 00:16:13 +0200