Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42225 (RAJ)

SMT. ANA SABOOR D/O SHRI IRFAN AHMED W/O SHRI MUKHTAR MOHSIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/481/2022 · 2025-09-25

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39630] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 481/2022 1. Smt. Ana Saboor D/o Shri Irfan Ahmed W/o Shri Mukhtar Mohsin, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Inayat Apartment, House No. 55, Street No. 35, Zakir Nagar, Police Station Jamiya, Delhi. 2. Asad Ahmed S/o Shri Iqbal Ahmed, Aged About 27 Years, Resident of 836 Katra Hindun Faras Khana, Police Station Lahori Gunj, North, Delhi. 3. Mohammed Bilal @ Sohail S/o Shri Mohammed Afjal Ahmed, Aged About 22 Years, Resident of F 56/17, Third Floor, Jogabai, Batla House, Okhla, Jamiya Nagar, South Delhi. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Smt. Zeba Usmani W/o Shri Munavvar Usmani, Resident Of 3/29, B-Block, Panchsheel, Ajmer, Police Station, Christian Gunj, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Fahad Hasan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Saransh Saini, Adv. for respondent No.2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 25/09/2025 1. Instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition was filed by and on behalf of accused-petitioners wayback on 12.01.2022 for quashing of FIR No.650/2021 registered at Police Station Christian Ganj, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 379 & 365 of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:39630] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-481/2022] 2. Learned Public Prosecutor, at the outset, has pointed out that in the impugned FIR, after thorough investigation, charge-sheet against accused-petitioners for offences under Section 341, 323, 365 & 34 of IPC has been submitted before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate No.3, Ajmer on 28.04.2022. The factual report dated 16.09.2025 is taken on record. 3. In view of submission of charge-sheet, counsel for petitioners is fair enough to make a prayer for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to take legal remedies and to file a fresh petition, in case, accrual of any new and fresh cause of action. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Mohita/Ronak/192-S