Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42223 (AP)

K .Purushotham Mandadi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/21040/2019 · 2025-10-28

Ninala Jayasurya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010437382019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 21040/2019 Between: 1. K .PURUSHOTHAM MANDADI,, S/O. LATE K.VENKATA MANDADI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. NALLARALLAPALLE VILLAGE, G.D NELLORE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, GANGADHARA NELLORE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V MUNI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) NJS,J W.P No.21040 of 2019 2 The Court made the following Order: The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition in short is that, pending disposal of the Revision Petition, CCLA’s Ref.No.P1/254/2007 pending before the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, the respondent No.3 is interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the subject matter property i.e., Ac. 0.25 cents in Survey No.07, Ac. 3.00 cents in Survey No.13P, Ac. 1.90 cents in Survey No.14 of Nallarallapalle Village, G.D Nellore Mandal, Chittoor District. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. This Court on 26.12.2019, at the time of considering the matter ‘for Admission’ granted interim order of status quo and the same is being extended from time to time. Be that as it may. 4. In the counter-affidavit filed by the respondent No.3, it is stated that the Revision Petition is pending. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions states that the revision is still pending, before the Revisional Authority. 6. In view of the same, instead of examining the matter on merits, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, with a direction to the Revisional Authority before whom the Revision Petition is pending to dispose of the same, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of three (03) months NJS,J W.P No.21040 of 2019 3 from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in accordance with law. 7. Till disposal of the Revision Petition, the interim orders granted by this Court shall remain in operation. 8. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:29.10.2025 Ksj