- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37906 RSA No. 1520 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1520 OF 2021 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. PUTTAMMA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, W/O LATE SHANKARAPPA 2. BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O LATE SHANKARAPPA APPELLANTS 1 AND 2 ARE R/O PALLAGATTE VILLAGE, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 528. 3. VANAJAKSHI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, W/O PRAVEENKUMAR R/O HEBALAGERE VILLAGE, CHANNAGIRI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 213. 4. MAMATA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, W/O NAGAPPA, R/O GODA VILLAGE, PALLAGATTE POST, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 528. …APPELLANTS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37906 RSA No. 1520 of 2021 (SMT. PUTTAMMA, APPELLANT NO.1; SRI. BASAVARAJU, APPELLANT NO.2; SMT. VANAJAKSHI, APPELLANT NO.3, SMT. MAMATA, APPELLANT NO.4, ALL ARE ABSENT) AND: 1. ANASUYAMMA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, W/O LATE NARAPPA R/O PALLAGATTE VILLAGE, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 528 2. KIRAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAPPA R/O PALLAGATTE VILLAGE, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 528 3. SHWETHA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, W/O SHIVAKUMAR R/O KURKI VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK - 577 001. 4. SUNITHA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, W/O VEERESHA, R/O BHARAMASAGARA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 519. 5. S B YOGESHWARAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LATE BASAPPA, R/O PALLAGATTE VILLAGE, JAGALUR TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 528 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37906 RSA No. 1520 of 2021 6. NANJAMMA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, W/O LATE T CHANNAPPA 7. BASAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, W/O D BHOJANAGOWDA, R/O SOKKE VILLAGE, JAGALUR TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 528 8. S B SHIVAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O LATE BASAPPA 9. KALPANA AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, W/O RAJAPPA 10. S N NAVEEN AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O LATE NAGAPA 11. PREMAKKA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, W/O LATE NAGAPPA RESPONDENTS 6 AND 8 TO 11 ARE R/O PALLAGATTE VILLAGE, JAGALUR TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 528. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R.GOPALA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5 AND R8 TO R11; R6 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.07.2020 PASSED IN RA.NO.15/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE. PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37906 RSA No. 1520 of 2021 DECREE DATED 01.12.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO.92/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DAVANAGERE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants was permitted to retire vide Court order dated 09.09.2025 and thereafter, Court notices were issued to the appellants. 2. The Court notices were served on the appellants and they have not chosen to engage any advocate on their behalf. 3. Left with no alternative, appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 CT: BHK