MCC No. 902 of 2025 2025:CGHC:45259 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 902 of 2025 Ku. Sangeeta Dondilkar D/o Shri Vasant Dondilkar Aged About 45 Years Working As Staff Nurse At Pt. J. N. Memorial Medical College, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Health And Family Welfare, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Secretary Medical Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3. Director Directorate Medical Education Health Building, Second Floor, North Block, Sector- 19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru Judgment on Board 04/09/2025 1. This MCC has been registered on a request sent by the Additional Secretary, Medical Education Department, Government of C.G. to the Registrar, High Court of C.G. with a request for extension of time for compliance of order passed by this court in WPS No. 2487 and other connected matters. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.09.04 17:42:00 +0530 MCC No. 902 of 2025 2. From perusal of the said communication, it appears that in WPS No. 2487 of 2025 and other connected cases, there was a direction to respondent/ Director, Medical Education to consider and decide the respective representation of the petitioners within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, the representations have not been decided till date and a communication was sent by the Director, Medical Education seeking extension of time for compliance of the order 15.04.2025 passed in WPS No. 2487 of 2025 and other connected matters. 3. The communication sent by the State authority directly to the Registrar of High Court is not the proper procedure for seeking extension of time for compliance of order passed by this Court in any proceeding. State should file proper application for extension of time through the office of Advocate General for extension of time if any for compliance of directions issued by the High Court. 4. Hence, the Registry is directed to return the original PUD to the concerned authority after retaining a photocopy of the same. 5. The MCC is disposed off with the aforesaid direction. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Jyoti