APHC010597032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31442/2025 Between: 1. PALLI APPI REDDY, M. TECH, S/O. LAKSHMI REDDY, AGED 82 YEARS, RTD S.E.(APSEB), D. NO. 6-92, REDDY STREET, AKIVIDU (V) AND (M), WEST GODAVARI (D). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPT, SECRETARIAT (BLDGS), NELAPADU (V), TULLURU (M), GUNTUR (D) 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER CUM COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR LAND ACQUISITION, NH165 MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGH WAYS, AKIVIDU BY PASS), BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the 2nd Respondent neither considering the Petitioners representation Dt.26-09-2025 nor intimating status of the same is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India. and consequently directing the 2nd Respondent to dispose of the Petitioners representation Dt.26-09-2025 within a timeframe by giving affordable opportunity of hearing as per procedure established under Law and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K K DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “to issue an appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the 2nd Respondent neither considering the Petitioner’s representation Dt.26-09-2025 nor intimating status of the same; is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India; and consequently directing the 2nd Respondent to dispose of the Petitioner’s representation Dt.26-09- 2025 within a timeframe by giving affordable opportunity of hearing as per procedure established under Law and pass…”(in verbatim) 2. This Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondent authorities to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 26.09.2025 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) months, by affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 3. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH 14th November, 2025 cbn 4 155 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH Writ Petition No.31442 of 2025 14th November, 2025 cbn