HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 6819 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Sri Devesh Vikram Singh, learned ACSC for the State- respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within two months from today. October 6, 2025 Priya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Komal Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Sri Arun Kumar Singhania .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad