$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 14991/2024 VINITA NAGPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Mr. Vishal Rai, Mrs. Radhika Rai, Mr. Kalash Pandey & Mr. Naved Ahmed, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manisha Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 14.01.2026 CM APPL. 74757/2025 1. The grievance raised in the instant application is with respect to pending representation dated 15.10.2024 which has been directed to be decided by this Court vide its judgment dated 16.09.2025. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since there is no time prescribed for taking the decision, therefore, the matter is being unnecessarily pending before the authority. 3. On the other hand, Ms. Manisha Aggarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that all endeavours are being made to decide the representation and the authority has also called upon the parties to furnish relevant information. Ms. Aggarwal then submits that the authority may at least take two months time to decide the same. The Court, however, in the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/01/2026 at 13:35:02 interest of justice grants her three months time. However, if the representation is not decided, the Court shall be constraint to take serious view in the matter. 4. The petitioner’s undertaking is placed on record that they will fully cooperate with the authority. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the application stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 14, 2026 tr/ap This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/01/2026 at 13:35:02