Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42204 (ALL)

SUJAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

ABAIL/9898/2020 · 2025-09-23

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9898 of 2020 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Compliance affidavit filed by the State is taken on record. 2. Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant. Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned AGA for the State is present. 3. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0015 of 2020, under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471, 420,204, 201, 120B IPC and section 13(1)(d), 2 and 3 P.C. Act, Police Station Jaitipur, District Shahjahanpurwith a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial. 4. The instant anticipatory bail application is pending since the year 2020, therefore, it reflects, either applicant has lost the interest in the matter or by efflux of time, the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. 5. In view of above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed. 6. However, it is open for the applicant to file recall application if cause of action still survives. September 24, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dharmendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sameer Jain,J.) Sujan Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad