SURESHKUMAR SHRIKISAN BHAYYA v. M/S SOLAPUR STEEL WORKS, PARTNERSHI FIRM ITS PARTNERS SUNIL RAMLING GAVSUNE
CRA/552/2024 · 2025-04-25
Shri Madhav J Jamdar
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42202 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42202 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
923-CRA-552-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.552 OF 2024 Sureshkumar Shrikisan Bhayya …Applicant Versus M/s. Solapur Steel Works, Partnershi Firm Its Partners Sunil Ramling Gavsune …Respondent _______________________________________________________________ Mr. P. R. Arjunwadkar i/b Prabha Badadare, for the Applicant. Mr. Vdaya Sankar Samudrala, for the Respondent. _______________________________________________________________
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED: 25th APRIL 2025 P.C.:
1. Heard Mr. Arjunwadkar, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr. Samudrala, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent.
2. The challenge in this Civil Revision Application is to the order dated 20th June 2024 passed by the learned District Judge-3, Solapur in Regular Civil Appeal No.69 of 2020.
3. Both the learned Counsel after arguing the matter for some time, on instructions, submitted that by consent of the parties the impugned
Judgment and Decree be quashed and set aside and the said Regular Civil Appeal No.69 of 2020 be restored to the file of the learned District Judge-3, Solapur.
4. Accordingly, by consent of the parties the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 20th June 2024 passed by the learned District Judge-3, Vaibhav Page No. 1
923-CRA-552-2024.doc Solapur in Regular Civil Appeal No.69/2020 is quashed and set aside and said Regular Civil Appeal No.69 of 2020 is restored to the file of learned District Judge-3, Solapur.
5. It is clarified that this Court has not considered the merits and all
contentions on merits are expressly kept open.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Vaibhav Page No. 2