Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42201 (KAR)

DILIP RAJEGOWDA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/3749/2023 · 2025-07-25

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28642 CRL.P No. 3749 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3749 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: DILIP RAJEGOWDA S/O RAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS BENDEGERE VILLAGE HIRISAVE HOBLI CHANNARAYAPTA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 560 045. PRESENT ADDRESS RAMESH HOUSE 4TH CROSS, VIJAYANAGARA, 3RD STAGE, ISHWARYA HOSPITAL ROAD MYSORE CITY - 12 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRATHEEP K C.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE VIJAYANAGAR POLICE STATION BENGALURU DISTRICT REP BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU. Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28642 CRL.P No. 3749 of 2023 2. PALANISWAMY C S/O CHANDRASHEKAR M G AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS BRANCH MANAGER, INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK NO 70/5, SUVARNA TOWERS NEAR BDA COMPLEX NAGARBHAVI MAIN ROAD MAGADI MAIN ROAD BENGALURU CITY - 560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.30644/2021 (CR.NO.61/2021) AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF 24TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE COURT BANGALORE DISTRICT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. 2. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28642 CRL.P No. 3749 of 2023 3. This matter is of the year 2023. 4. Vide order dated 06.06.2025, a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9