PANKAJ KUMAR SAINI S/O CHHITAR MAL SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/13030/2025 · 2025-08-29
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42199 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42199 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34694] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13030/2025 Pankaj Kumar Saini S/o Chhitar Mal Saini, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Dhani Badwala, Post Ganeshwar, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jaipur.
3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Verma on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 29/08/2025
1. Issue notices to the respondents.
2. Mr. Rahul Verma, learned counsel has put in appearance and accepts notices on behalf of the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that although the petitioner possess requisite experience certificates yet his candidature has been rejected on the ground that as per letter dated 07.02.2025 issued by the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Jaipur, since the experience Certificates No. 143 & 144 possessed by the petitioner dated 19.05.2023 have not been verified,
[2025:RJ-JP:34694] (2 of 2) [CW-13030/2025] consequential benefit of bonus marks has not been extended to the petitioner.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in the similar circumstances, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.07.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8820/2025 (Swati Mishra Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) has disposed of the writ petition with direction to Nodal Officer (Recruitment) and Joint Director of the Medical and Health Department to get the experience certificate re-verified.
5. In view of above and in the light of directions given by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Swati Mishra (supra) the instant writ petition is also disposed of with regard to verify the experience certificate of the petitioner within a period of four weeks and in case the experience certificate is verified and on the basis of such verification petitioner is found entitled to bonus marks, further exercise may be conducted accordingly.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.
7. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/14