Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42197 (AP)

M/s. SPRNG Soura Kiran Vidyut Private Limited v. Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission,

WP/27427/2025 · 2025-11-20

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010521122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 27427 OF 2025 Between: 1. M/s. SPRNG Soura Kiran Vidyut Private Limited, Registered Office- Unit No FF-48 A, First Floor, Omaxe Square, Plot No. 14, Jasola District Centre, New Delhi-110025, Rep. by its Authorized Signatory Kalla Rajesh Kumar ...Petitioner AND 1. Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Rep. by its Secretary, Office at Vidyut Niyantra Bhavan, Adjacent to 220/132/33/11 KV, AP Carbides Sub-Station Dinnedevarapadu Road, Kurnool-518 002. (A.P) 2. Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited, rep. by its Chairperson/Managing Director, 19-13-65/A, Srinivasapuram, Tiruchanoor Road, Tirupati-517 503 3. Eastern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited, rep. by its Chairperson/Managing Director P and T Colony, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530 013 4. Solar Energy Corporation of India, Rep. by its Managing Director 1st floor, A-Wing, D-3, District Centre Saket, New Delhi -110017 5. Andhra Pradesh State Load Dispatch Centre, Rep. by its Chief Electrical, Vidyut Soudha, Gunadala Eluru Road, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh- 520004. 6. Union of India, ministry of power, rep.by its secretary Rafi Marg, Shram Shakti Bhavan, New Delhi-110001 7. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Energy (infrastructure and investment) Department, A.P. Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District Andhra Pradesh. 2 ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondents: VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondents:V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri N. Sai Phanindra Kumar, learned Counsel representing M/s CKR Associates, appearing for Writ Petitioner and Sri K. Ashok, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL. 2. Sri N. Sai Phanindra Kumar, learned Counsel representing M/s CKR Associates, appearing for Writ Petitioner submits that the interim directions granted by this Court have been complied with by the Respondents. He would also submit that, in view of this compliance, no cause survives, and therefore, no further consideration is necessary. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Order as to Costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 21.11.2025 JKS 3 38 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 27427 OF 2025 21.11.2025 JKS