1 2025:CGHC:44874 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4691 of 2025 1 - Ravindar Singh Bedi S/o Late Indrajeet Singh Bedi, Aged About 62 Years Having Registered Address At - Infront Of Stadium, Adarsh Nagar, Sitapur, District - Surguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Transport, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - Regional Transport Officer, Ambikapur Region, Ambikapur, District Surguja C.G. 3 - Regional Transport Officer, Bilaspur Region, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, C.G. 4 - Collector, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, C.G. ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Tanmay Thomas, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 03/09/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- “10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue suitable directions/orders/writs to the respondent authorities to set aside the impugned order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) issued by respondent No. 4 for being illegal and arbitrary. 2 10.2 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief(s)/order(s)/direction(s) in favour of the petitioner, which may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for a liberty to file an application/representation before the concerned authorities and the same may be decided in accordance with law. 3. Learned counsel for respondents does not oppose the limited prayer. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the submission of the respondents instead of keeping this petition pending, this Court find it appropriate to direct the petitioner to file an application/representation in respect of his grievance within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order before the authorities and the authorities concerned shall consider and decide the application of the petitioner in accordance with law/rules/regulations. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 7. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti