CRM-M-738 IN T 128 DEEPANS STATE OF CORAM: Present: SURYA PA ground tha from paraly to the exten 2. Mewat for of NDPS A 3. detailed rep filed by the 73818-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ CHANDIGAR PANSHU @DEEPANSHU RAM RA VERSUS TE OF HARYANA AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUR Ms. Manpreet Ghuman, Advoc Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG Har **** YA PARTAP SINGH, J. (Oral): This petition seeking for int nd that the mother of the petitioner is paralysis and the abovementioned ailm e extent of 80%. The record reveals that the pe at for the commission of offence pun DPS Act and Section 238 of the BNS Notice of the petition has alrea reply as well as the custody cert by the State. The same be taken on rec PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IGARH CRM-M-73818-2025 (O&M DECIDED ON: 27.02.202 M RAKHYANI .....PETITIONE RSUS .....RESPONDEN SURYA PARTAP SINGH Advocate for the petitioner. G Haryana. or interim bail has been filed on th oner is seriously ill, as she is sufferin ailment has rendered her disabled petitioner is lodged in District Jai e punishable under Sections 21 and 2 BNS in FIR No.277 dated 24.12.2024 s already been served upon the State. y certificate of the petitioner has bee on record. (O&M) 02.2026 IONER DENT on the uffering bled up rict Jail, and 29 .2024. State. A been VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.02.27 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-738 4. been disput disabled to 5. 6. the petition have any s nobody to bail be ac 7. abovementi Counsel is petitioner of any pend 8. contended petitioner i interim bail 9. 10. the fact th mother, as held that o 73818-2025 (O&M) 2 A perusal of abovementioned disputed that the mother of petitioner led to the extent of 80%. Heard. It has been contended by learn etitioner is the only son of his widow any sibling. According to learned co dy to look after his ailing mother, and ccorded to him. The learned State Cou ementioned arguments. The main thr sel is that in the present case, the pe ioner, has already been dismissed as w pending petition for regular bail, this In addition to above, the l nded that in the present petition, i ioner is trying to seek the regular b im bail is being sought, has not been pr The record has been perused c Taking into consideration the act that the petitioner is the only so er, as he has no brother, sister, father that on humanitarian ground, the pe tioned reply shows that the fact has n itioner is suffering from paralysis and y learned counsel for the petitioner th widowed mother, and that he does ned counsel for the petitioner, there er, and therefore, the benefit of interi Counsel has controverted th in thrust of argument of learned Sta etition for regular bail, filed by th d as withdrawn, and that in the absenc il, this petition is not sustainable. the learned State Counsel has als tion, in the name of interim bail th ular bail, as the period for which th een prescribed. used carefully. on the fact that there is no dispute qu son who can look after his ailin father or wife in his family, it is hereb the petitioner is entitled for bail for has not and is ner that not e is interim d the ed State d by the absence as also bail the ich the ute qua is ailing s hereby il for a VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.02.27 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-738 limited per the petition the conditio Court/Duty authorities 11.





    73818-2025 (O&M) 3 ed period. In view of above, the prese etitioner is admitted to interim bail for ondition of his furnishing bail bonds /Duty Magistrate. The petitioner is di rities by 05:00 P.M. on 28.03.2026. 
  
 
  Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No  Whether reportable Yes/No present petition is hereby allowed an for a period of one month, subject onds to the satisfaction of learned tri r is directed to surrender before the ja         es/No es/No and bject to ned trial the jail 
 VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.02.27 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document