RAMANDEEP SINGH SALUJA v. SHRI AWANISH KUMAR SHARAN
CONT/1263/2024 · 2025-01-10
Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42188 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42188 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:1673
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1263 of 2024 Ramandeep Singh Saluja S/o Paramjeet Singh Saluja Aged About 32 Years R/o Old High Court Road, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s)/Applicant versus Shri Awanish Kumar Sharan Collector Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Dubey, Advocate
(Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Order on Board
10/01/2025
1. The applicant has preferred this contempt petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India alleging non-compliance of Order dated 11.9.2024 passed in WPC No.4550 of 2024 (Annexure-C/1).
2. This Court has passed following order in aforesaid writ petition, which reads as under:-
6. In the aforementioned facts of the case I find it appropriate to dispose of this petition at this stage directing respondent No.1 to take action and decision on the representation/memo dated 12.12.2023 requesting for constitution of District Level Committee for re-demarcating BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2025.01.15 14:39:48 +0530
2 the land bearing Kh.No.304/2 measuring area admeasuring 0.304 hectares situated at Ghuru, P.H. no. 61, R.I.C. - Sakri, Tahsil Sakri, District Bilaspur, C.G in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of order.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that order under contempt dated 11.9.2024 passed by this Court in WPC No.4550/2024 has been complied with.
4.
Learned counsel for the respondents also conceded the aforesaid
facts.
5. In view of the above contention of both learned counsel for the parties, since order of contempt has been complied with, no case of contempt is made out.
6. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. The rule is discharged. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini