VIPIN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECRY. AND 3 OTHERS
SPLA/1909/2013 · 2025-09-08
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42186 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 42186 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1909 of 2013 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. List has been revised. Learned counsel for the appellant is not present to press the present appeal.
2. Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 9, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Shyam Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shivam Yadav (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Vipin Kumar .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secry. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad