APHC010110182024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5849 OF 2024 Between: 1. KOLLIPAKULA KIRAN KUMAR, S/o. K.V. Subba Rao, aged about 37 years, R/o. D.No. 20-4/1-43E/F-208, Padmavathi Enclave, Subbraju Nagar, Near Ajit Singnagar police Station, New Rajarajeswaripeta, Vijayawada. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep by Principal Secretary ( Home Department), Secretriat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Prakasam. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ongole, Prakasam District, Prakasam. 4. The Inspector of Police, Yerragondapalem Police Station, Yerragondapalem, Prakasam District. 5. The SubInspector of Police, Yerragondapalem Police Station, Yerragondapalem, Prakasam District. 6. Kolipakula Sowjanya, W/o. Kiran Kumar, aged about 34 years, R/o. H.No. 3-20, Gurijepalli, Yerragondapalem,Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 5, who has harassing the petitioner by directing the petitioner to attend to the Respondent No.5 police station, to settle the matrimonial disputes with the Respondent No.6 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and violation of Articles 14,19(l)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents authorities not to interfere into life and liberty of the petitioner's without following due process of law and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No. 3 to 5, not to interfere into the life and liberty of the petitioner, basing upon the complaint of Respondent No.6, without following due process of law, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: NAGA RAJU KOLLATI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5849 OF 2024 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 5, who has harassing the petitioner by directing the petitioner to attend to the Respondent No.5 police station, to settle the matrimonial disputes with the Respondent No.6 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and violation of Articles 14,19(l)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents authorities not to interfere into life and liberty of the petitioner's without following due process of law and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and to pass such other order or orders…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner also heard Sri. Ajay Babu learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing the respondent Nos.1 to 5. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 are harassing the petitioner by directing him to attend to the police station to settle the matrimonial disputes with the Respondent No.6. 4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the report given by the respondent No.6, respondent No.5 called the petitioner several times only for the purpose of enquiry regarding the complaint which is given by the respondent No.6, but the petitioner did not choose to appear. 5. Recording the submission of learned Assistant Government Pleader, this writ petition is disposed of. The police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.12.2025 Ksj