Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 42178 (CHH)

NARENDRA KUMAR BARGHAH v. SMT. KEMLATA PANDAY

WP227/753/2022 · 2025-03-10

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:11842 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 753 of 2022 1 - Narendra Kumar Barghah S/o Kanhiyalal Aged About 50 Years R/o Bilha, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Kemlata Panday W/o Prabhakar Pandey R/o Village Bartori, Tahsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Tahsildar Belha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Sanjay Khatri, Advocate For State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. A.G. along with Mr. Sanjeev Agrawal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 10.03.2025 1. Mr. Pandey, the learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State would submit that against the order passed by the Board of Revenue, the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India would not be maintainable. In support of his contention, he placed reliance on the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Single Bench of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the matter of Dr. Ram Sharan Lal Tripathi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others, passed in WPC No.2113 of 2015. REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH Date: 2025.03.11 10:31:39 +0530 -2- 2. At this stage, Mr. Vikas Pandey, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. 3. Permission is granted. 4. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Certified copy of the impugned order be returned after retaining its xerox copy. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha